Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977282›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2022

Comparison of Dental Care Visits Before and After Adoption of a Policy to Expand the Dental Workforce in Minnesota.

Hawazin W Elani, Elizabeth Mertz, Ichiro Kawachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hawazin W ElaniDepartment of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth MertzPreventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, Healthforce Center, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco.
Ichiro KawachiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Health Reform and Oral Health Disparities: a Mixed Methods EvaluationR00MD012253 · NIMHD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ELANI, HAWAZIN W · 2021 to 2023
$746k
NIMHD NIH HHS R00 MD012253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Currently, 13 states and tribal nations have expanded their dental workforce by adopting use of dental therapists. To date, there has been no evaluation of the influence of this policy on dental care use. Objective: To assess changes in dental care use in Minnesota after the implementation of the policy to authorize dental therapists in 2009. Design Setting and Participants: In this cross-sectional study of 2 613 716 adults aged 18 years and older, a synthetic control method was used to compare changes in dental care use after the authorization of the policy in Minnesota relative to a synthetic control of nonadopting states. Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 2006 to 2018 were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2021, to December 18, 2021. Exposure: Authorization of dental therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported indicator for whether a respondent had visited a dentist or a dental clinic in the past 12 months. Results: Among 2 613 716 adults aged 18 years or older, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 46.0 (17.7) years, 396 501 were women (weighted percentage, 51.3%), 503 197 were White (weighted percentage, 67.9%), 54 568 were Black (weighted percentage, 10.1%), 39 282 were Hispanic (weighted percentage, 14.5%), and 34 739 were other race (weighted percentage, 6.7%). The proportion of adults visiting a dentist before the authorization of dental therapists in Minnesota was 76.2% (95% CI, 75.0%-77.4%) in the full sample, 61.5% (95% CI, 58.4%-64.6%) for low-income adults, and 58.4% (95% CI, 53.0%-63.5%) among Medicaid-eligible adults. Authorizing dental therapists in Minnesota was associated with an increase of 7.3 percentage points (95% CI, 5.0-9.5 percentage points) in dental care use among low-income adults, a relative increase of 12.5% (95% CI, 8.6%-16.4%), and an increase of 6.2 percentage points (95% CI, 2.4-10.0 percentage points) among Medicaid-eligible adults, a relative increase of 10.5% (95% CI, 3.9%-17.0%). In addition, the policy was associated with an increase in dental visits among White adults (low-income sample, 10.8 percentage points [95% CI, 8.5-13.0 percentage points]; Medicaid sample, 13.5 percentage points [95% CI, 9.1-17.9 percentage points]), with no corresponding increases among other racial and ethnic groups in the low-income and Medicaid population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, expanding the dental workforce through authorization of dental therapists appeared to be associated with an increase in dental visits. In Minnesota, the policy was associated with improved access to dental care among low-income adults overall. However, racial and ethnic disparities in dental use persist.

Indexed as

Dental CarePolicyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMinnesotaUnited StatesWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID35977282
PMCPMC8933736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.