Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977275›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2022

Association of Hospital Interoperable Data Sharing With Alternative Payment Model Participation.

A Jay Holmgren, Jordan Everson, Julia Adler-Milstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New indices to track interoperability among US hospitals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Experiences with information blocking in the United States: a national survey of hospitals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Jay HolmgrenUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Jordan EversonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Julia Adler-MilsteinUniversity of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Learning Health System Scholar Program at VanderbiltK12HS026395 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROTHMAN, RUSSELL L., ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Health Information Exchange to Improve Outcomes in Complex Older PatientsR01AG062563 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER-MILSTEIN, JULIA ROSE · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026395NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Interoperable patient data exchange across hospitals remains an important policy goal for reducing costs and improving the quality of care. Congress designated 2018 as the goal for nationwide interoperability, and policy makers hoped that aligning financial incentives via alternative payment models (APMs) would help achieve that goal. Objective: To measure interoperability progress since 2014, assess the association between alternative payment model participation and hospital engagement in interoperable data sharing from 2014 to 2018, and evaluate hospital-reported barriers to interoperability in 2018. Design Setting and Participants: This cohort study included nonfederal acute care hospitals in the US from January 2014 to December 2018 that responded to the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Data were analyzed from October 2019 through March 2021. Exposures: Participation in an APM, including accountable care organizations, bundled payments, or patient-centered medical homes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital engagement in all 4 domains of interoperability: finding/querying for data, sending data electronically, receiving data electronically, and integrating electronic patient data from external care delivery organizations. Results: The sample included 3928 hospitals in the US from January 2014 to December 2018. Progress across interoperability domains was uneven, 2430 (88.3%) hospitals sending and 2115 (76.9%) receiving patient data electronically in 2018. However, only 1249 (45.4%) hospitals engaged in all 4 domains of interoperability in 2018, and growth between 2014 and 2018 was slow. There was no evidence that participation in APMs was associated with interoperability, with multivariate models suggesting that participation in an APM was associated with only a non-statistically significant 1-percentage point increase in interoperability engagement (β = 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03). The most commonly cited barrier to interoperability was challenges associated with sharing data across different electronic health record vendors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of hospital interoperability, fewer than half of US hospitals were engaged in interoperable data exchange in 2018. There was no observable evidence that hospital APM participation was associated with interoperability engagement. Many hospitals report technical and governance challenges to data sharing that are unlikely to be addressed by the alignment of financial incentives alone.

Indexed as

Accountable Care OrganizationsHospitalsCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsHumansInformation DisseminationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35977275
PMCPMC8903122
OpenAlexW4212817091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.