Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977264›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2021

Trends in Dialysis Industry Consolidation After Medicare Payment Reform, 2006-2016.

Caroline E Sloan, Abby Hoffman, Matthew L Maciejewski, Cynthia J Coffman, Justin G Trogdon, Virginia Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Physician responses to Medicare reimbursement rates.Journal of health economics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline E SloanDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Abby HoffmanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Matthew L MaciejewskiDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Cynthia J CoffmanHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Justin G TrogdonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Virginia WangDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University Health System · USDurham VA Health Care System · USHealth Services Research & Development · US

Funding

Cascading Impacts of Bundled Payment on Peritoneal Dialysis Provision & OutcomesR01DK097165 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, VIRGINIA · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The dialysis industry is highly concentrated, with large dialysis organizations now providing dialysis for more than 85% of patients with kidney failure in the United States. In 2011, Medicare introduced a new Prospective Payment System (PPS) for end-stage kidney disease, which bundled payment for dialysis care into 1 payment per patient. Trends in dialysis facility consolidation after the PPS went into effect are unknown. Objective: To determine whether the introduction of the PPS in 2011 was associated with an acceleration in acquisitions and closures of small dialysis chains (<20 facilities) and independently owned facilities. Design Setting and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included all Medicare-certified independent or small chain-affiliated dialysis facilities in the continental US between 2006 and 2016. Data were obtained from Medicare and the US Renal Data System and were analyzed in 2020. Exposures: The PPS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Discrete time hazard models were used to estimate the odds of acquisition and closure before the PPS (2006-2010) vs after the PPS (2011-2016). Analyses controlled for facility, market, and regional demographic characteristics. The average predicted marginal probabilities of acquisition and closure over time were estimated. Results: The proportion of small chain-affiliated and independently owned facilities declined from 29% (1383 of 4750 facilities) in 2006 to 15% (1038 of 6738) in 2016. Among 13 481 facility-years, 6352 (47%) were for profit, and mean (SD) census was 68 (59) patients. Overall, 3286 (24%) facilities opened during the observation period. The proportion of acquisitions that occurred each year varied from 1.1% (12 of 1065 facilities in 2015) to 7.2% (86 of 1192 facilities in 2012), while closures varied from 0.8% (9 of 1065 facilities in 2015) to 2.2% (28 of 1286 facilities in 2010), making both fairly rare. There was a 3.48 higher odds of acquisition in the post-PPS period compared with the pre-PPS period (95% CI, 1.62-7.47; Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of continental US Medicare-certified dialysis facilities, small-chain and independently owned facilities retained a declining share of the dialysis market. Further research should evaluate the effect of continued dialysis market consolidation on patient access, health care utilization, and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Prospective Payment SystemRenal DialysisAgedCohort StudiesHumansMedicareRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35977264
PMCPMC8796909
OpenAlexW3211342851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.