Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977252›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2022

Spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Before and After Confirmation of Benefit for Drugs Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2012 to 2017.

Joshua J Skydel, Alexander C Egilman, Joshua D Wallach, Reshma Ramachandran, Ravi Gupta, Joseph S Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aducanumab, Accelerated Approvals & the Agency: Why the FDA Needs Structural Reform.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua J SkydelDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Alexander C EgilmanProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joshua D WallachDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Reshma RamachandranNational Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ravi GuptaNational Clinician Scholars Program, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joseph S RossNational Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) grants market authorization for drugs based on clinical trials using surrogate end points likely to anticipate a clinical benefit. The FDA requires postapproval trials to confirm benefit, after which the accelerated approval is converted to a standard approval or is withdrawn. However, trials frequently fail to assess clinical benefit, and expenditure for these drugs may be substantial. Objective: To evaluate spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on drugs granted FDA accelerated approval before and after confirmation of benefit. Design and Setting: This was a cross-sectional study of CMS spending on drugs granted FDA accelerated approval for original indications from 2012 to 2017, with follow-up through 2020. Using data from the Drugs@FDA database and a validated methodology, the characteristics of new drugs granted FDA accelerated approval were identified and analyzed, including indication area, type of drug, type of confirmatory trial end point, orphan designation, number of supplemental indications, and conversion status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall and annualized spending by Medicare Parts B and D and Medicaid from 2012 to 2020, before and after conversion to standard approval. Analyses were conducted from June 30, 2021, to March 21, 2022. Results: From 2012 to 2017, the FDA granted accelerated approval to 38 drugs for 42 original indications. Through 2020, CMS spending for these drugs was $67.9 billion (median [IQR], $329.3 million [$54.4 million-$1.6 billion]). For 22 drugs (58%) that were converted to standard approval on the basis of clinical trial results, annualized spending increased substantially after conversion ($35.0 million vs $199.0 million), and spending after conversion accounted for $51.0 billion (75%) of overall spending. However, only 6 conversions (27%) of the 22 were supported by confirmatory trials evaluating clinical outcomes as primary end points. Drugs evaluated using surrogate end points accounted for $40.3 billion (59%) of CMS spending. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study indicate that most of the drugs granted FDA accelerated approval for original indications from 2012 to 2017 lacked confirmatory trials evaluating clinical outcomes to support conversion to standard approval. Automatic coverage mandates produced substantial CMS spending for drugs with unproven clinical benefits.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalMedicaidBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesMedicarePharmaceutical PreparationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiomarkersPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID35977252
PMCPMC9142876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.