ArticleJAMA health forum2022
Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cancer-related mortality among solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Pooled it
- De novo cancer-related mortality after solid organ transplantation in England: the EpCOT study.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Economic Burden for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer by EAU Progression Risk Groups Using the Prospective Multicenter COBLAnCE Cohort Linked to the French National Healthcare System Database.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Estimating the Healthcare Cost of Infection-Related Hospitalisations in Multiple Myeloma.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Global inequalities in tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer care quality from 1990 to 2021.iScience · 2026Article
- Insurance Network Status and 1-Year Health Care Utilization and Outpatient Costs Among Commercially Insured Patients With Newly Diagnosed and Non-Definitively Treated Prostate Cancer, 2010-2021.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Oncologists' Perspectives on Oncology Stewardship: A Focus Group Exploration in a Statewide Quality Improvement Consortium.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Oncologists' preferences for frontline TKI treatment of Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a discrete choice experiment.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Investigating Drug Treatment Costs and Patient Characteristics of Female Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancers in Antigua and Barbuda: A Retrospective Data Study (2017-2021).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Observational
- Variation in Cost Centers Following Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Analyzing the cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios and health expenditures in the aging population: a 20-year comparative study across high-income countries.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- Estimating the Direct Medical Costs of Smoking-Attributable Non-communicable Diseases in Northeastern Iran From 2015 to 2023.Tobacco use insights · 2025Article
- Changes in essential cancer medicines and association with cancer outcomes: an observational study of 158 countries.BMC cancer · 2024Observational
- Chasing cancer: does the social-to-medical spending ratio relate to cancer incidence and mortality in Canadian provinces? A retrospective cohort study.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Digital pathology, deep learning, and cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2024Review
- Healthcare Cost Burden and Self-Reported Frequency of Depressive/Anxious Feelings in Older Adults.Journal of gerontological social work · 2024Article
- Article
- Global transcriptomic network analysis of the crosstalk between microbiota and cancer-related cells in the oral-gut-lung axis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- South Korea's Medical Tourism Competitiveness and Future Strategy: Focused on Cancer Treatment: A Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Studies using data from before 2011 concluded that the cost of US cancer care is justified given improved outcomes compared with European countries. However, it is unclear whether contemporary US cancer care provides better value than that of other high-income countries. Objective: To assess whether cancer mortality rates in 2020 were lower in countries with higher cancer-related spending, and to estimate across countries the incremental cost per averted cancer death. Design Setting and Participants: Cross-sectional, national-level analysis of 22 high-income countries, assessing the association between cancer care expenditures and age-standardized population-level cancer mortality rates in 2020, with and without adjustment for smoking. In addition, US incremental costs per averted death compared with the other countries were calculated. This study was conducted from September 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Age-standardized population-level cancer mortality rates. Results: In this cross-sectional study of 22 countries, the median cancer mortality rate was 91.4 per 100 000 population (IQR, 84.2-101.6). The US cancer mortality rate was higher than that of 6 other countries (86.3 per 100 000). Median per capita spending in USD for cancer care was $296 (IQR, $222-$348), with the US spending more than any other country ($584). After adjusting for smoking, 9 countries had lower cancer care expenditures and lower mortality rates than the US. Of the remaining 12 countries, the US additionally spent more than $5 million per averted death relative to 4 countries, and between $1 and $5 million per averted death relative to 8 countries. Cancer care expenditures were not associated with cancer mortality rates, with or without adjustment for smoking (Pearson Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of national cancer care expenditures and cancer mortality rates across 22 countries, although the cancer mortality rate in the US was lower than the median, the US spent twice as much on cancer care as the median country. Findings of this study suggest that the US expenditure on cancer care may not be commensurate with improved cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.