Trial reportJAMA health forum2022
Effect of Integrating Access to a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Within the Electronic Health Record on the Frequency of Queries by Primary Care Clinicians: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04601506 (PRescribing INterventions for Chronic Pain Via the Electronic Health Record Study - Primary Care Providers), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PRescribing INterventions for Chronic Pain Via the Electronic Health Record Study - Primary Care Providers
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Reminder Emails, Program Use, and Prescribing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA health forum · 2025Trial
- Learning from Misses: Evaluating a Clinical Decision Support for Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Trial
- Implementing pharmacist-prescriber collaboration to improve evidence-based anticoagulant use: a randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2023Trial
- Impacts of a Statewide Prescription Drug Monitoring Program-Healthcare Practitioner Perspectives.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Awareness about opioids crisis, policies and regulation of opioid stewardship at hospitals settings: a nationwide cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals from Pakistan.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026Article
- Clinician Time Savings and Financial Value of Workstation Single Sign-On and Access Management in the United Kingdom and Ireland.Advances in health information science and practice · 2025Article
- Medical Marijuana Documentation Practices in Patient Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Observational Study Using Smart Data Elements and a Review of Medical Records.JMIR formative research · 2024Observational
- Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations to increase the use of a clinical decision support tool for managing chronic pain in primary care.International journal of medical informatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Learning health systems on the front lines to strengthen care against future pandemics and climate change: a rapid review.BMC health services research · 2024Review
- Changes in opioid prescribing and prescription drug monitoring program utilization following electronic health record integration-Massachusetts, 2018.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2024Article
- An Electronic Health Record-Integrated Application for Standardizing Care and Monitoring Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Enrolled in a Tolvaptan Clinic: Design and Implementation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Prescription drug monitoring program use by opioid prescribers: a cross-sectional study.Health affairs scholar · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Tools that are directly integrated with the electronic health record (EHR) workflow can reduce the hassle cost of certain guideline-concordant practices, such as querying a prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) before prescribing opioids. Objective: To investigate the effect of integrating access to a PDMP within the EHR on the frequency of program queries by primary care clinicians. Design Settings and Participants: The PRINCE (Prescribing Interventions for Chronic Pain Using the Electronic Health Record) randomized trial used a factorial cluster design at the clinic level in 43 primary care clinics in Minnesota. In all, 309 clinicians participated; 161 clinicians were given EHR-integrated access to PDMP at the intervention clinics, and 148 clinicians had the usual access at the control clinics. The intervention went live on August 27, 2020, and data were collected through March 3, 2021. Intervention: Single sign-on access to the Minnesota PDMP was integrated into the EHR, allowing clinicians to query a patient's controlled substance prescription and dispensing history as recorded in the Minnesota PDMP directly from the patient's EHR record without logging into a separate web portal. Additionally, the integration tool alerted clinicians and reminded them to review the PDMP if a patient had 3 or more opioid prescriptions in the past year and 1 or more in the past 6 months. Clinics in the control group did not receive access to the EHR-integrated PDMP tool; instead, these participants logged into the PDMP web portal separately. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly PDMP query counts for primary care clinicians, overall and by modality (EHR-based, web-based, via a clinical delegate), adjusted for clinician characteristics, including type (physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant), sex, and years in practice. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to May 2022. Results: Of the 43 participating clinics with 309 clinicians, 21 clinics with 161 clinicians (102 [63.4%] women; 114 [70.8%] physicians; tenure, 10.6 [4.4] years) received the PDMP integration intervention. Baseline unadjusted monthly PDMP query rates for the average clinician were 6.6 (95% CI, 4.4-9.9) vs 8.8 (95% CI, 6.0-13.1) queries in the control vs the PDMP integration group, respectively. During the intervention, PDMP query rates for the average clinician were 6.9 (95% CI, 4.7-10.3) vs 14.8 (95% CI, 10.0-22.0) queries among the control vs the PDMP integration group, respectively. Compared with the control group, the EHR-integrated PDMP tool produced a 60% greater increase in the relative change in monthly PDMP queries (95% CI, 51%-70%). An increase in PDMP queries via the EHR-integrated PDMP tool drove this increase, while web-based and delegate queries declined by 39% more among the intervention compared with the control group (95% CI, 34%-43%). Conclusions and Relevance: This cluster randomized clinical trial found that integrating access to the PDMP in the EHR increased PDMP-querying rates, suggesting that direct access reduced hassle costs and can dramatically improve adherence to guideline-concordant care practices among primary care clinicians. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04601506.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.