Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35977173›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2021

Association Between Medicaid Prescription Drug Limits and Access to Medications and Health Care Use Among Young Adults With Disabilities.

Caroline K Geiger, Jessica L Cohen, Benjamin D Sommers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline K GeigerHarvard University, Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jessica L CohenDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin D SommersDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Global Health Institute · USHarvard University · USHarvard University Press · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prescription drugs are necessary for managing complex physical and mental health conditions for more than 10 million Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities. However, some state Medicaid programs limit the number of prescription drugs that beneficiaries can obtain monthly, which may decrease access to essential medications. Objective: To examine the association between exposure to the 3-drug limit at age 21 years in Arkansas and Texas and prescription drug and health care use among beneficiaries with disabilities enrolled in Medicaid. Design Setting and Participants: In this cohort study of 28 046 young adults with disabilities, difference-in-differences analysis was performed using Medicaid Analytic eXtract claims data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012. Analyses were completed December 1, 2020. The analyses included Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities in Arkansas and Texas (ie, drug cap states) or 15 comparison states without drug cap policies who became age 21 years during the study period and were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicaid in the year before and after that point. Exposures: Exposure to the 3-drug prescription limit at age 21 years in 2 drug cap states. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly total prescriptions and prescriptions for drugs to treat mental health conditions, total prescription drug spending, and inpatient and emergency department visits and spending in the 12 months before and after becoming age 21 years. Results: Among 28 046 young adults with disabilities, 8214 (29.3%) resided in drug cap states and were subject to the 3-drug limit at age 21 years. Most individuals were male (drug cap states: 61.4%, comparison states: 60.6%), and the minority were White individuals (drug cap states: 36.7%, comparison states: 49.4%). More than one-half of individuals with disabilities were diagnosed with a mental health condition before age 21 years (drug cap states: 57.0%, comparison states: 60.0%). In the year before the analyzed individuals became aged 21 years, the mean (SD) number of prescriptions per beneficiary per month was 1.58 (2.16) in drug cap states vs 1.82 (1.91) in comparison states. The drug cap policy was associated with 19.6% (95% CI, -21.3% to -17.8%; Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of young adults with disabilities, drug cap policies were associated with lower rates of access to important medications and higher rates of hospitalization among individuals in states with drug cap policies vs those without these policies.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesPrescription DrugsSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedicaidSelf ReportUnited StatesYoung AdultPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID35977173
PMCPMC8796920
OpenAlexW3170983817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.