Observational studyPloS one2022
Relationships between double cycling and inspiratory effort with diaphragm thickness during the early phase of mechanical ventilation: A prospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06357780 (Closed-loop syncHronization vErsuS convenTional Synchronization in sPontaneously Breathing Adult Nonivasive Ventilation Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Closed-loop syncHronization vErsuS convenTional Synchronization in sPontaneously Breathing Adult Nonivasive Ventilation Patients (CHEST-SPAN) - a Randomized Cross-over Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Flow starvation during square-flow assisted ventilation detected by supervised deep learning techniques.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreased and decreased diaphragm thickness during mechanical ventilation is associated with poor outcomes. Some types of patient-ventilator asynchrony theoretically cause myotrauma of the diaphragm. However, the effects of double cycling on structural changes in the diaphragm have not been previously evaluated. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between double cycling during the early phase of mechanical ventilation and changes in diaphragm thickness, and the involvement of inspiratory effort in the occurrence of double cycling.
methodsWe evaluated adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. The end-expiratory diaphragm thickness (Tdiee) was assessed via ultrasonography on days 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 after the initiation of mechanical ventilation. Then, the maximum rate of change from day 1 (ΔTdiee%) was evaluated. Concurrently, we recorded esophageal pressure and airway pressure on days 1, 2 and 3 for 1 h during spontaneous breathing. Then, the waveforms were retrospectively analyzed to calculate the incidence of double cycling (double cycling index) and inspiratory esophageal pressure swing (ΔPes). Finally, the correlation between double cycling index as well as ΔPes and ΔTdiee% was investigated using linear regression models.
resultsIn total, 19 patients with a median age of 69 (interquartile range: 65-78) years were enrolled in this study, and all received pressure assist-control ventilation. The Tdiee increased by more than 10% from baseline in nine patients, decreased by more than 10% in nine and remained unchanged in one. The double cycling indexes on days 1, 2 and 3 were 2.2%, 1.3% and 4.5%, respectively. There was a linear correlation between the double cycling index on day 3 and ΔTdiee% (R2 = 0.446, p = 0.002). The double cycling index was correlated with the ΔPes on days 2 (R2 = 0.319, p = 0.004) and 3 (R2 = 0.635, p < 0.001).
conclusionsDouble cycling on the third day of mechanical ventilation was associated with strong inspiratory efforts and, possibly, changes in diaphragm thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.