Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976810›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

COVID-19 vaccination uptake in 441 socially and ethnically diverse pregnant women.

Fatima Husain, Veronica R Powys, Eleanor White, Roxanne Jones, Lucy P Goldsmith, Paul T Heath, Pippa Oakeshott, Mohammad Sharif Razai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Influences on Vaccine Decision-Making During Pregnancy.Journal of midwifery & women's health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatima HusainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom.
Veronica R PowysDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom.
Eleanor WhiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom.
Roxanne JonesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom.
Lucy P GoldsmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul T HeathVaccine Institute, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Pippa OakeshottPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Mohammad Sharif RazaiPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6671-5557
St George's, University of London · GBWexham Park Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore COVID-19 vaccination uptake, facilitators and barriers in ethnically-diverse pregnant women. DESIGN AND

settingAn anonymous quality improvement questionnaire survey exploring COVID-19 vaccination uptake, causes of vaccine hesitancy and trusted sources of information among pregnant women in two acute district general hospitals in England (Berkshire and Surrey) between 1.9.21 and 28.2.22. POPULATION: 441 pregnant women attending routine antenatal clinic appointments.

methodsConsented pregnant women completed the survey either electronically using a QR code or on paper. Descriptive data were summarised and free text responses were thematically analysed.

results441 pregnant women, mean age 32 years (range 17-44), completed the survey. Twenty-six percent were from ethnic minority groups, and 31% had a co-morbid health condition. Most respondents (66.2%) had been vaccinated against COVID-19 with at least one dose (White British 71.9%, Asian 67.9%, White-other 63.6%, Black 33%). The most common reasons for not being vaccinated were concerns about effects on the unborn baby and future pregnancies, anxiety about possible adverse impact on the mother, not enough known about the vaccine, and lack of trust in vaccines. Comments included: "I'd rather not risk injecting the unknown into my body", and "I don't trust it." Although 23% used social media for information on COVID-19 vaccination, the most trusted sources were the patient's GP and midwife (43%) and official health-related websites such as NHS (39%).

conclusionsA third of these pregnant women had not been vaccinated against COVID-19. Trusted health professionals like midwives and GPs could have a crucial role in increasing vaccination uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesEthnicityFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMinority GroupsPregnancyVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35976810
PMCPMC9385003
OpenAlexW4292117575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.