Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976687›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Immunogenicity evaluation of ChAdox1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in solid cancer patients in Chulabhorn Hospital.

Piyarat Limpawittayakul, Prakongboon Sungkasubun, Worawit Chaiwiriyawong, Archara Supavavej, Bowon Weerasubpong, Jomtana Siripaibun, Chumut Phanthunane, Wisut Lamlertthon, Teerapat Ungtrakul, Kriangkrai Tawinprai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piyarat LimpawittayakulDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prakongboon SungkasubunDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worawit ChaiwiriyawongDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Archara SupavavejDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bowon WeerasubpongDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jomtana SiripaibunDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chumut PhanthunaneDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wisut LamlertthonPrincess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teerapat UngtrakulPrincess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kriangkrai TawinpraiDepartment of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Walaipan TantiyavarongDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chayanee SamdaengpanDivision of Medical Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulabhorn Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer patients are more vulnerable to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) owing to their compromised immune status. However, data regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety and immune response in cancer patients are scarce.

methodThis prospective, age- and sex-matched, single-center cohort study included 61 cancer patients and 122 healthy control participants. Seropositivity was defined as anti-S IgG titer >0.8 units/ml. Primary end point was seroconversion rate of immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein (anti-S IgG) in cancer patients vs. healthy control participants following the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222).

resultsAfter the second-dose vaccination, there was no difference in seropositivity rate between groups (57 [93.44%] patients with cancer vs. 121 [99.18%] control participants; geometric mean ratio [GMR]: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.01-10.46;

conclusionsThe anti-S IgG seropositivity rate after completing the second vaccine dose did not differ between the cancer patients and control participants. However, the anti-S IgG seropositivity rate after the first-dose vaccination was lower in cancer patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsVaccinesAntibodies, ViralChAdOx1 nCoV-19Cohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHospitalsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunoglobulin GProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GVaccinesAZD1222ChAdox1 nCov-19seropositivitysolid cancertitervaccine

Identifiers

PMID35976687
PMCPMC9746434
OpenAlexW4292103426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.