Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976650›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2022

Outcomes in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Without Acute Intracranial Traumatic Injury.

Debbie Y Madhok, Robert M Rodriguez, Jason Barber, Nancy R Temkin, Amy J Markowitz, Natalie Kreitzer, Geoffrey T Manley, TRACK-TBI Investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Nanozyme-based therapeutic strategies for traumatic brain injury.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Emergency Department Feasibility of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) for Research in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Debbie Y MadhokDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
Robert M RodriguezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
Jason BarberDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Nancy R TemkinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Amy J MarkowitzBrain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Natalie KreitzerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Geoffrey T ManleyBrain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
TRACK-TBI Investigators
College Track · USSan Francisco General Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects millions of people in the US each year. Most patients with TBI seen in emergency departments (EDs) have a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 and a head computed tomography (CT) scan showing no acute intracranial traumatic injury (negative head CT scan), yet the short-term and long-term functional outcomes of this subset of patients remain unclear. Objective: To describe the 2-week and 6-month recovery outcomes in a cohort of patients with mild TBI with a GCS score of 15 and a negative head CT scan. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed participants who were enrolled from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study, a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with TBI that was conducted in EDs of 18 level I trauma centers in urban areas. Of the total 2697 participants in the TRACK-TBI study, 991 had a GCS score of 15 and negative head CT scan and were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2021, to May 30, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) score, which was stratified according to functional recovery (GOS-E score, 8) vs incomplete recovery (GOS-E score, <8), at 2 weeks and 6 months after the injury. The secondary outcome was severity of mild TBI-related symptoms assessed by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) total score. Results: A total of 991 participants (mean [SD] age, 38.5 [15.8] years; 631 male individuals [64%]) were included. Of these participants, 751 (76%) were followed up at 2 weeks after the injury: 204 (27%) had a GOS-E score of 8 (functional recovery), and 547 (73%) had a GOS-E scores less than 8 (incomplete recovery). Of 659 participants (66%) followed up at 6 months after the injury, 287 (44%) had functional recovery and 372 (56%) had incomplete recovery. Most participants with incomplete recovery reported that they had not returned to baseline or preinjury life (88% [479 of 546]; 95% CI, 85%-90%). Mean RPQ score was 16 (95% CI, 14-18; P < .001) points lower at 2 weeks (7 vs 23) and 18 (95% CI, 16-20; P < .001) points lower at 6 months (4 vs 22) in participants with a GOS-E score of 8 compared with those with a GOS-E score less than 8. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that most participants with a GCS score of 15 and negative head CT scan reported incomplete recovery at 2 weeks and 6 months after their injury. The findings suggest that emergency department clinicians should recommend 2-week follow-up visits for these patients to identify those with incomplete recovery and to facilitate their rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionBrain Injuries, TraumaticAdultCohort StudiesGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35976650
PMCPMC9386538
OpenAlexW4293901152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.