Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976500›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2022

Rehabilitation and return to sports after isolated meniscal repairs: a new evidence-based protocol.

Filippo Calanna, Victoria Duthon, Jacques Menetrey

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Filippo CalannaCentre de Médecine du Sport Et de L'Exercice, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Hirslanden Clinique La Colline, Geneva, Switzerland. filippocalanna@gmail.com.
Victoria DuthonCentre de Médecine du Sport Et de L'Exercice, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Hirslanden Clinique La Colline, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jacques MenetreyCentre de Médecine du Sport Et de L'Exercice, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Hirslanden Clinique La Colline, Geneva, Switzerland.
Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini · ITOlympic Medical Center · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite many protocols that have been proposed, there's no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal rehabilitation program and return to sports (RTS) protocol following isolated meniscal repair. The aim of this current concept review is to look at the evidence of rehabilitation and RTS program after isolated meniscal repair, focusing on general and specific protocols per type of injury trying to give some guidelines based on the current state of knowledge.

methodsA narrative literature review was performed searching PubMed database to identify relevant articles from January 1985 to October 2021 on rehabilitation and RTS after isolated meniscal repair. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cadaveric studies and basic science studies were included.

resultsWhen the hoop tensile stress effect is preserved, an accelerated rehabilitation program may be suggested. Hence, partial weight bearing (20 kg) in association with ROM limited to 90° is allowed for the first four weeks, followed by weight bearing as tolerated. In contrast, when circumferential hoop fibers are disrupted, a restricted rehabilitation protocol may be recommended. In this scenario no weight bearing is allowed for the first six weeks after the surgery and range of motion (ROM) is limited to 90°.

conclusionBiomechanical evidence suggests that tailoring an individualized protocol based upon the type of lesion and meniscus stability is reasonable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

Meniscal sutureMeniscusRehabilitation protocolRTSTraumatic tears

Identifiers

PMID35976500
PMCPMC9385921
OpenAlexW4292266991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.