Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976432›Full record

SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2023

Psychosocial work factors affecting mental health of young workers: a systematic review.

Malte van Veen, Karen M Oude Hengel, Roosmarijn M C Schelvis, Paulien M Bongers, Johannes C F Ket, Allard J van der Beek, Cécile R L Boot

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Aspects of young employees' mental health: a narrative review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malte van VeenNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Unit Healthy Living, Leiden, The Netherlands. malte.vanveen@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8980-5432
Karen M Oude HengelNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Unit Healthy Living, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-2660
Roosmarijn M C SchelvisBody@Work, Research Center on Work, Health and Technology, TNO/VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7660-0270
Paulien M BongersNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Unit Healthy Living, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johannes C F KetMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1909-3150
Allard J van der BeekAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4672-9062
Cécile R L BootAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5021-9957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFor the general working population, robust evidence exists for associations between psychosocial work exposures and mental health. As this relationship is less clear for young workers, this systematic review aims at providing an overview of the evidence concerning psychosocial work factors affecting mental health of young workers.

methodsThe electronic databases used were PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO and were last searched in October 2021. The eligible outcomes included depression-, stress-, burnout- and anxiety-related complaints, and fatigue, excluding clinical diagnoses and suicide-related outcomes. Only studies with workers aged 35 years or younger were included, which reported at least one association between a psychosocial work factor as exposure and a mental health complaint as outcome. Studies had to be in English, German or Dutch. Risk of bias was assessed using an instrument from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Data synthesis was conducted using GRADE.

resultsIn total 17 studies were included in this systematic review, including data from 35,600 young workers in total. Across these studies 86 exposure-outcome associations were reported. Nine exposure-outcome associations could be synthesised. The application of the GRADE framework led to one "low" assessment for the association between psychosocial job quality and mental health. The certainty of evidence for the other eight associations in the synthesis was very low.

conclusionsThe current systematic review disclosed a high degree of uncertainty of the evidence due to conceptually fuzzy outcomes and exposures as well as large heterogeneity between studies.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSuicideAnxietyAnxiety DisordersFatigueHumansMental healthPsychosocial work factorsSystematic reviewYoung workers

Identifiers

PMID35976432
PMCPMC9823059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.