ArticleUrolithiasis2022
What treatments reduce kidney stone risk in patients with bowel disease?
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatic Analysis of Oxalate-Degrading Enzymes in Probiotics: A Systematic Genome-Scale and Structural Survey.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Association of chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea with renal stones: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Metabolic Profile of Calcium Oxalate Stone Patients with Enteric Hyperoxaluria and Impact of Dietary Intervention.Nutrients · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We examined how physicians made therapeutic choices to decrease stone risk in patients with bowel disease without colon resection, many of whom have enteric hyperoxaluria (EH), at a single clinic. We analyzed clinic records and 24-h urine collections before and after the first clinic visit, among 100 stone formers with bowel disease. We used multivariate linear regression and t tests to compare effects of fluid intake, alkali supplementation, and oxalate-focused interventions on urine characteristics. Patients advised to increase fluid intake had lower initial urine volumes (L/day; 1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.7 ± 0.7) and increased volume more than those not so advised (0.7 ± 0.6 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6 p = 0.03; intervention vs. non-intervention). Calcium oxalate supersaturation (CaOx SS) fell (95% CI -4.3 to -0.8). Alkali supplementation increased urine pH (0.34 ± 0.53 vs. 0.22 ± 0.55, p = 0.26) and urine citrate (mg/d; 83 ± 256 vs. 98 ± 166, p = 0.74). Patients advised to reduce oxalate (mg/day) absorption had higher urine oxalate at baseline (88 ± 44 vs. 50 ± 26) which was unchanged on follow-up (88 (baseline) vs. 91 (follow-up), p = 0.90). Neither alkali (95% CI -1.4 to 2.1) nor oxalate-focused advice (95% CI -1.2 to 2.3) lowered CaOx SS. Physicians chose treatments based on baseline urine characteristics. Advice to increase fluid intake increased urine volume and decreased CaOx SS. Alkali and oxalate interventions were ineffective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.