Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976404›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Cardiac MRI of congenital heart disease : From fetus to adult].

Thomas M Vollbrecht, Julian A Luetkens

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas M VollbrechtKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Julian A LuetkensKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. julian.luetkens@ukbonn.de.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important diagnostic tool for initial diagnostic workup and follow-up of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) of different age groups.

objectivesThis review provides an overview of clinically applied MRI sequences for the assessment of CHD, highlights technical developments, and demonstrates key aspects of reporting in specific heart defects. MATERIALS AND

methodsPresentation of epidemiologic data, summary of studies on MRI sequences and their clinical application, and demonstration of clinical examples.

resultsThe broad spectrum of congenital heart defects requires the use of various sequences, which can be modified depending on patient age or treatment status. Cine imaging can be used to assess cardiac function and volumes, phase contrast flow measurements allow for the assessment of vessel hemodynamics, and various techniques of MR angiography allow visualization of the thoracic vessels with high spatiotemporal resolution. New developments allow high-resolution vascular imaging without the need for contrast agents, assessment of additional hemodynamic parameters, or fetal cardiac MRI.

conclusionCardiac MRI can be employed in children as well as in adults with CHD. By using different sequences and considering the treatment status and surgery-related complications, the vast majority of clinical questions can be answered.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalAdultChildContrast MediaFetusHemodynamicsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaCardiovascular imagingCongenital heart defectsFetal cardiac MRIHeart diseasesImaging Protocol

Identifiers

PMID35976404
OpenAlexW4292103792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.