Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976322›Full record

ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2022

Anticoagulation and Stroke.

Gisela Tinone, Mauricio Hoshino, Leandro Lucato, Luiz Roberto Comerlatti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gisela TinoneUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4793-2521
Mauricio HoshinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-1523
Leandro LucatoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9181-5245
Luiz Roberto ComerlattiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-5190
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, the American Heart Association did not recommend the emergent use of anticoagulation to prevent recurrence or progression of acute ischemic stroke. However, its indication in patients with extracranial artery intraluminal thrombus with artery-to-artery cerebral embolization must be analyzed. In this article, we will also discuss other indications of anticoagulation. This treatment could be indicated in patients with ischemic stroke caused by embolization from cervical artery dissection, catastrophic antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome (APS) and some cases of Covid 19. For secondary prevention, anticoagulation is recommended for Cardioembolic stroke such as nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and other cardiopathies, some patients with cervical artery dissection, stroke associated with cancer, and thrombophilia such as APS. The timing to restart anticoagulation after a large ischemic stroke or after a cerebral hemorrhagic transformation always represent a challenge. Even in patients with high risk of thromboembolism it should be delayed at least two weeks, ideal after four weeks.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCOVID-19Ischemic StrokeStrokeAnticoagulantsHumansAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID35976322
PMCPMC9491440
OpenAlexW4290975840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.