Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976313›Full record

ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2022

Decision-making strategies for reperfusion therapies: navigating through stroke trials gaps.

Mateus Paquesse Pellegrino, Felipe Borelli Del Guerra, Iago Navas Perissinotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mateus Paquesse PellegrinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto de Radiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5629-435X
Felipe Borelli Del GuerraHospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-9148
Iago Navas PerissinottiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3685-9565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite there being a robust amount of literature and numerous randomized clinical trials regarding acute ischemic stroke treatment, the trials have not included some frequent controversial situations for which decision-making strategies are an urgent and unmet need in clinical practice. This article tries to summarize the current evidence about some selected situations (mechanical thrombectomy in low ASPECTS, low NIHSS with proximal occlusion, acute basilar occlusion, distal and medium vessel occlusion, among others), make suggestions on how to approach them in clinical practice and show what to expect in acute stroke research in the near future.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansReperfusionRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35976313
PMCPMC9491414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.