Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976305›Full record

ReviewArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2022

Update on the diagnosis and management of neurocysticercosis.

Osvaldo Massaiti Takayanagui, Tissiana Marques de Haes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Repair capacity ofFuture microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Racemose neurocysticercosis mimicking craniopharyngioma.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human Neurocysticercosis: An Overview.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Osvaldo Massaiti TakayanaguiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Neurociências e Comportamento, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8190-0275
Tissiana Marques de HaesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Neurociências e Comportamento, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4450-4898
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurocysticercosis (NCC) is a serious public health problem in several developing countries, including those in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. NCC is considered to be the main cause of late-onset epilepsy in endemic areas.

objectiveThis review summarizes recent advances in diagnosis and therapy of NCC. Methods: Relevant articles and books were reviewed and used as a source of information for this review.

resultsThe diagnosis of NCC is based upon neuroimaging studies (MRI and computed tomography) and laboratory analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Praziquantel and albendazole are considered parasiticidal drugs against NCC, but there is an intense debate over the value and safety of these drugs.

conclusionGiven the relative scarcity of clinical trials, more comparative interventional studies, especially randomized controlled trials in long-term clinical evolution, are required in order to clarify the controversy over the validity of parasitic therapy in patients with NCC.

Indexed as

EpilepsyNeurocysticercosisAlbendazoleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPraziquantelAlbendazolePraziquantel

Identifiers

PMID35976305
PMCPMC9491409
OpenAlexW4290975823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.