Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976166›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

Genomics-informed delineation of conservation units in a desert amphibian.

Brenna R Forester, Melanie Murphy, Chad Mellison, Jeffrey Petersen, David S Pilliod, Rachel Van Horne, Jim Harvey, W Chris Funk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brenna R ForesterDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1608-1904
Melanie MurphyDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
Chad MellisonU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, NV, USA.
Jeffrey PetersenNevada Department of Wildlife, Elko, NV, USA.
David S PilliodU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4207-3518
Rachel Van HorneU.S. Forest Service, Sparks, NV, USA.
Jim HarveyU.S. Forest Service, Sparks, NV, USA.
W Chris FunkDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-3618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delineating conservation units (CUs, e.g., evolutionarily significant units, ESUs, and management units, MUs) is critical to the recovery of declining species because CUs inform both listing status and management actions. Genomic data have strengths and limitations in informing CU delineation and related management questions in natural systems. We illustrate the value of using genomic data in combination with landscape, dispersal and occupancy data to inform CU delineation in Nevada populations of the Great Basin Distinct Population Segment of the Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris). R. luteiventris occupies naturally fragmented aquatic habitats in this xeric region, but beaver removal, climate change and other factors have put many of these populations at high risk of extirpation without management intervention. We addressed three objectives: (i) assessing support for ESUs within Nevada; (ii) evaluating and revising, if warranted, the current delineation of MUs; and (iii) evaluating genetic diversity, effective population size, adaptive differentiation and functional connectivity to inform ongoing management actions. We found little support for ESUs within Nevada but did identify potential revisions to MUs based on unique landscape drivers of connectivity that distinguish these desert populations from those in the northern portion of the species range. Effective sizes were uniformly small, with low genetic diversity and weak signatures of adaptive differentiation. Our findings suggest that management actions, including translocations and genetic rescue, might be warranted. Our study illustrates how a carefully planned genetic study, designed to address priority management goals that include CU delineation, can provide multiple insights to inform conservation action.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetic VariationGenomicsRanidaeadaptive differentiationconservation genomicsevolutionarily significant unitsgenetic rescuemanagement unitsRana luteiventris

Identifiers

PMID35976166
PMCPMC9804278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.