ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022
Development of a usability checklist for public health dashboards to identify violations of usability principles.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Standardized Framework for Evaluating State Opioid Surveillance Dashboards: A Health Informatics Assessment.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Development and Usability of a Social Determinants of Health Dashboard in School-based Health.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2026Article
- Uncertainty displays in pandemic dashboards: a review of COVID-19 use cases.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the usability of public health data dashboards as information sources for professionals and the public: Findings from a case study with domain experts.Health information and libraries journal · 2025Article
- Usability and usefulness of U. S. federal and state public health data dashboards: implications for improving data access and use.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Rank Ordered Design Attributes for Health Care Dashboards Including Artificial Intelligence: Usability Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024Article
- Public Maternal Health Dashboards in the United States: Descriptive Assessment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The Solutions in Health Analytics for Rural Equity Across the Northwest (SHARE-NW) Dashboard for Health Equity in Rural Public Health: Usability Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Digital health: dashboards, dashboards, everywhere.Australian prescriber · 2024Article
- Integrating human-centered design in public health data dashboards: lessons from the development of a data dashboard of sexually transmitted infections in New York State.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Meeting the information and communication needs of health disparate populations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a usability checklist for public health dashboards. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study systematically evaluated all publicly available dashboards for sexually transmitted infections on state health department websites in the United States (N = 13). A set of 11 principles derived from the information visualization literature were used to identify usability problems that violate critical usability principles: spatial organization, information coding, consistency, removal of extraneous ink, recognition rather than recall, minimal action, dataset reduction, flexibility to user experience, understandability of contents, scientific integrity, and readability. Three user groups were considered for public health dashboards: public health practitioners, academic researchers, and the general public. Six reviewers with usability knowledge and diverse domain expertise examined the dashboards using a rubric based on the 11 principles. Data analysis included quantitative analysis of experts' usability scores and qualitative synthesis of their textual comments.
resultsThe dashboards had varying levels of complexity, and the usability scores were dependent on the dashboards' complexity. Overall, understandability of contents, flexibility, and scientific integrity were the areas with the most major usability problems. The usability problems informed a checklist to improve performance in the 11 areas. DISCUSSION: The varying complexity of the dashboards suggests a diversity of target audiences. However, the identified usability problems suggest that dashboards' effectiveness for different groups of users was limited.
conclusionsThe usability of public health data dashboards can be improved to accommodate different user groups. This checklist can guide the development of future public health dashboards to engage diverse audiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.