ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022
Insights from the genomes of 4 diploid Camelina spp.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A fourth subgenome of the Camelina genus reveals gene dominance is influenced by chromosomal proximity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Complex Interplay of Tandem, Segmental, Whole Genome Duplication, and Re-organization Drives Expansion of SAUR Gene Family in Brassicaceae.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Genomic advances in orphan and underutilized Brassicaceae crops and their wild relatives.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Chromosome fusions shaped karyotype evolution and evolutionary relationships in the model family Brassicaceae.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genome-wide identification and diversity of FAD2, FAD3 and FAE1 genes in terms of biotechnological importance in Camelina species.BMC biotechnology · 2024Article
- Exploring genetic diversity, population structure, and subgenome differences in the allopolyploidHorticulture research · 2024Article
- The ancestral karyotype of the Heliantheae Alliance, herbicide resistance, and human allergens: Insights from the genomes of common and giant ragweed.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Chromosome-level assembly and analysis of Camelina neglecta: a novel diploid model for Camelina biotechnology research.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- Sequencing of Camelina neglecta, a diploid progenitor of the hexaploid oilseed Camelina sativa.Plant biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Overcoming genetic paucity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant evolution has been a complex process involving hybridization and polyploidization making understanding the origin and evolution of a plant's genome challenging even once a published genome is available. The oilseed crop, Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae), has a fully sequenced allohexaploid genome with 3 unknown ancestors. To better understand which extant species best represent the ancestral genomes that contributed to C. sativa's formation, we sequenced and assembled chromosome level draft genomes for 4 diploid members of Camelina: C. neglecta C. hispida var. hispida, C. hispida var. grandiflora, and C. laxa using long and short read data scaffolded with proximity data. We then conducted phylogenetic analyses on regions of synteny and on genes described for Arabidopsis thaliana, from across each nuclear genome and the chloroplasts to examine evolutionary relationships within Camelina and Camelineae. We conclude that C. neglecta is closely related to C. sativa's sub-genome 1 and that C. hispida var. hispida and C. hispida var. grandiflora are most closely related to C. sativa's sub-genome 3. Further, the abundance and density of transposable elements, specifically Helitrons, suggest that the progenitor genome that contributed C. sativa's sub-genome 3 maybe more similar to the genome of C. hispida var. hispida than that of C. hispida var. grandiflora. These diploid genomes show few structural differences when compared to C. sativa's genome indicating little change to chromosome structure following allopolyploidization. This work also indicates that C. neglecta and C. hispida are important resources for understanding the genetics of C. sativa and potential resources for crop improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.