Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35976075›Full record

ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2023

COVID-19 and artificial intelligence: Experts and dermatologists perspective.

Yaser Goldust, Farah Sameem, Samia Mearaj, Atula Gupta, Anant Patil, Mohamad Goldust

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaser GoldustDepartment of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
Farah SameemDermatology SKIMS Medical College Srinagar Kashmir, Srinagar, India.
Samia MearajInstitute of Dermatology Srinagar Kashmir, Srinagar, India.
Atula GuptaSkin-Aid Clinic, Gurugram, India.
Anant PatilDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9455-4025
Mohamad GoldustDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-1179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionArtificial intelligence (AI) has an important role to play in future healthcare offerings. Machine learning and artificial neural networks are subsets of AI that refer to the incorporation of human intelligence into computers to think and behave like humans.

objectiveThe objective of this review article is to discuss perspectives on the AI in relation to Coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

methodsGoogle Scholar and PubMed databases were searched to retrieve articles related to COVID-19 and AI. The current evidence is analysed and perspectives on the usefulness of AI in COVID-19 is discussed.

resultsThe coronavirus pandemic has rendered the entire world immobile, crashing economies, industries, and health care. Telemedicine or tele-dermatology for dermatologists has become one of the most common solutions to tackle this crisis while adhering to social distancing for consultations. While it has not yet achieved its full potential, AI is being used to combat coronavirus disease on multiple fronts. AI has made its impact in predicting disease onset by issuing early warnings and alerts, monitoring, forecasting the spread of disease and supporting therapy. In addition, AI has helped us to build a model of a virtual protein structure and has played a role in teaching as well as social control.

conclusionFull potential of AI is yet to be realized. Expert data collection, analysis, and implementation are needed to improve this advancement.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19DermatologistsHumansPandemicsReferral and Consultationartificial intelligenceCOVID-19dermatologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35976075
PMCPMC9537934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.