Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35975961›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of medicine2022

Vitamin D intakes and health outcomes in infants and preschool children: Summary of an evidence report.

Andrew R Beauchesne, Kelly Copeland Cara, Danielle M Krobath, Laura Paige Penkert, Shruti P Shertukde, Danielle S Cahoon, Belen Prado, Ruogu Li, Qisi Yao, Jing Huang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew R BeauchesneSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4117-7075
Kelly Copeland CaraSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1491-9539
Danielle M KrobathSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-5302
Laura Paige PenkertSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3056-984X
Shruti P ShertukdeSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5516-2264
Danielle S CahoonSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-1804
Belen PradoFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9828-5689
Ruogu LiSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5651-3644
Qisi YaoSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5786-0613
Jing HuangSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tee RehSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mei ChungSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5583-2870
Tufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA systematic review was commissioned to support an international expert group charged to update the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organisation (WHO)'s vitamin D intake recommendations for children aged 0-4 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsMultiple electronic databases were searched to capture studies published from database inception to the 2

resultsThe 146 included studies examined the effects of different vitamin D intake levels on a variety of health outcomes (e.g. infectious disease, growth, neurodevelopment, rickets, and bone mineral density), and on outcomes for setting vitamin D upper limits (e.g. hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis). For most outcomes, the strength of evidence was

conclusionsThe evidence report provided the expert group with a foundation and core set of data to begin their work to set vitamin D nutrient reference values. To move the field forward, future studies should use standardised 25(OH)D assay measurements and should examine the relationship between long-term vitamin D status and health outcomes.Key MessagesResults of a large complex systematic review suggest the current totality of evidence from trials and prospective observational studies do not reach sufficient certainty level to support a causal relationship between vitamin D intake and asthma, wheeze, eczema, infectious diseases, or rickets (most trials reported no rickets) in generally healthy infants and young children.In this systematic review, the only body of evidence that reached a

Indexed as

HypercalcemiaVitamin D DeficiencyChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsHumansHypercalciuriaInfantObservational Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsasthmaautoimmune diseasesbone densitychild developmentcommunicable diseasesinfantnutritional requirementspre-school childsystematic reviewVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID35975961
PMCPMC9387322
OpenAlexW4292265140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.