Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35975874›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2021

Law, human rights and gender in practice: an analysis of lessons from implementation of self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health.

Laura Ferguson, Manjulaa Narasimhan, Jose Gutierrez, William Jardell, Sofia Gruskin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Centring rights-based access to self-care interventions.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura FergusonAssociate Professor of Population and Public Health Sciences, Director of Research, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Correspondence: laura.ferguson@med.usc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-793X
Manjulaa NarasimhanScientist, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction - HRP, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jose GutierrezStudent, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
William JardellProject Specialist, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-8674
Sofia GruskinProfessor of Population and Public Health Sciences and Law, Director, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-care interventions for health are becoming increasingly available, and among the preferred options, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research assessed the extent of attention to laws and policies, human rights and gender in the implementation of self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health (SRH), to identify where additional efforts to ensure an enabling environment for their use and uptake will be useful. A literature review of relevant studies published between 2010 and 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Relevant data were systematically abstracted from 61 articles. In March-April 2021, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 key informants, selected for their experience implementing self-care interventions for SRH, and thematically analysed. Laws and policies, rights and gender are not being systematically addressed in the implementation of self-care interventions for SRH. Within countries, there is varied attention to the enabling environment including the acceptability of interventions, privacy, informed consent and gender concerns as they impact both access and use of specific self-care interventions, while other legal considerations appear to have been under-prioritised. Operational guidance is needed to develop and implement supportive laws and policies, as well as to ensure the incorporation of rights and gender concerns in implementing self-care interventions for SRH.

Indexed as

genderhuman rightslaw and policyreproductive healthself-caresexual health

Identifiers

PMID35975874
PMCPMC9387312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.