ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2021
Law, human rights and gender in practice: an analysis of lessons from implementation of self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Latin America: Public policies, healthcare systems and human rights.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Review
- Improving monitoring of sexual, reproductive health, and rights globally.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- [Applicability of World Health Organization guidelines on self-care interventions for reproductive health in selected Latin American and Caribbean countriesAplicabilidade das diretrizes da Organização Mundial da Saúde sobre intervenções de autocuidado em saúde reprodutiva em países selecionados da América Latina e do Caribe].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Integrating international policy standards in the implementation of postnatal care: a rapid review.BMJ global health · 2024Review
- Barriers and facilitators to self-care practices for sexual and reproductive health among women of reproductive age.PloS one · 2024Article
- Centring rights-based access to self-care interventions.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-care interventions for health are becoming increasingly available, and among the preferred options, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research assessed the extent of attention to laws and policies, human rights and gender in the implementation of self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health (SRH), to identify where additional efforts to ensure an enabling environment for their use and uptake will be useful. A literature review of relevant studies published between 2010 and 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Relevant data were systematically abstracted from 61 articles. In March-April 2021, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 key informants, selected for their experience implementing self-care interventions for SRH, and thematically analysed. Laws and policies, rights and gender are not being systematically addressed in the implementation of self-care interventions for SRH. Within countries, there is varied attention to the enabling environment including the acceptability of interventions, privacy, informed consent and gender concerns as they impact both access and use of specific self-care interventions, while other legal considerations appear to have been under-prioritised. Operational guidance is needed to develop and implement supportive laws and policies, as well as to ensure the incorporation of rights and gender concerns in implementing self-care interventions for SRH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.