Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35975712›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Tradeoff breaking as a model of evolutionary transitions in individuality and limits of the fitness-decoupling metaphor.

Pierrick Bourrat, Guilhem Doulcier, Caroline J Rose, Paul B Rainey, Katrin Hammerschmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A New Classification Framework to Understand Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Evolutionary dynamics of nascent multicellular lineages.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Role specialization and reproductive division of labour at the origin of eusociality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pierrick Bourrat *Philosophy Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4465-6015
Guilhem Doulcier *Philosophy Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3720-9089
Caroline J RoseCentre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (CEFE), CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Paul B RaineyLaboratoire Biophysique et Évolution, CBI, ESPCI Paris, Université PSL, CNRS 75005 Paris, France, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0879-5795
Katrin HammerschmidtInstitute of Microbiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0172-8995

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary transitions in individuality (ETIs) involve the formation of Darwinian collectives from Darwinian particles. The transition from cells to multicellular life is a prime example. During an ETI, collectives become units of selection in their own right. However, the underlying processes are poorly understood. One observation used to identify the completion of an ETI is an increase in collective-level performance accompanied by a decrease in particle-level performance, for example measured by growth rate. This seemingly counterintuitive dynamic has been referred to as fitness decoupling and has been used to interpret both models and experimental data. Extending and unifying results from the literature, we show that fitness of particles and collectives can never decouple because calculations of fitness performed over appropriate and equivalent time intervals are necessarily the same provided the population reaches a stable collective size distribution. By way of solution, we draw attention to the value of mechanistic approaches that emphasise traits, and tradeoffs among traits, as opposed to fitness. This trait-based approach is sufficient to capture dynamics that underpin evolutionary transitions. In addition, drawing upon both experimental and theoretical studies, we show that while early stages of transitions might often involve tradeoffs among particle traits, later-and critical-stages are likely to involve the rupture of such tradeoffs. Thus, when observed in the context of ETIs, tradeoff-breaking events stand as a useful marker of these transitions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMetaphorPhenotypeSelection, Geneticcyanobacteriaevolutionary biologyevolutionary transitions in individualityfitnessPseudomonas fluorescenstradeoffs

Identifiers

PMID35975712
PMCPMC9470156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.