Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35975437›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Gut microbiota individuality is contingent on temporal scale and age in wild meerkats.

Alice Risely, Dominik W Schmid, Nadine Müller-Klein, Kerstin Wilhelm, Tim H Clutton-Brock, Marta B Manser, Simone Sommer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Climate Change, Epigenetics, Microbiota, and Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice RiselyInstitute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0731-2934
Dominik W SchmidInstitute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Nadine Müller-KleinInstitute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Kerstin WilhelmInstitute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tim H Clutton-BrockLarge Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8110-8969
Marta B ManserMammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Simone SommerInstitute for Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-8136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inter-individual differences in gut microbiota composition are hypothesized to generate variation in host fitness-a premise for the evolution of host-gut microbe symbioses. However, recent evidence suggests that gut microbial communities are highly dynamic, challenging the notion that individuals harbour unique gut microbial phenotypes. Leveraging a long-term dataset of wild meerkats, we reconcile these concepts by demonstrating that the relative importance of identity for shaping gut microbiota phenotypes depends on the temporal scale. Across meerkat lifespan, year-to-year variation overshadowed the effects of identity and social group in predicting gut microbiota composition, with identity explaining on average less than 2% of variation. However, identity was the strongest predictor of microbial phenotypes over short sampling intervals (less than two months), predicting on average 20% of variation. The effect of identity was also dependent on meerkat age, with the gut microbiota becoming more individualized and stable as meerkats aged. Nevertheless, while the predictive power of identity was negligible after two months, gut microbiota composition remained weakly individualized compared to that of other meerkats for up to 1 year. These findings illuminate the degree to which individualized gut microbial signatures can be expected, with important implications for the time frames over which gut microbial phenotypes may mediate host physiology, behaviour and fitness in natural populations.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaLongevityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sgut microbiomehost–microbiota interactionsintraclass correlation coefficientmeerkatsrepeatabilitytemporal dynamics

Identifiers

PMID35975437
PMCPMC9382201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.