Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35975340›Full record

ArticleJournal of postgraduate medicine

The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: Therapeutic privilege.

M Shalak, M A Shariff, V Doddapaneni, N Suleman

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of postgraduate medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Telling is Caring: Prioritizing the Best Interests of Dying Children.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026
    Article
  2. Ethical Considerations in Disclosing Orthopedic Implant Failures to Patients.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M ShalakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, Room 8-30 234E 149th St. The Bronx, NY, USA.
M A ShariffDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, Room 8-30 234E 149th St. The Bronx, NY, USA.
V DoddapaneniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, Room 8-30 234E 149th St. The Bronx, NY, USA.
N SulemanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, Room 8-30 234E 149th St. The Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term therapeutic privilege is unfamiliar in the medical field and often sparks questions and discomfort about its ethical implications. Therapeutic privilege refers to the act of withholding information by a clinician, with the underlying notion that the disclosure of this information would inflict harm or suffering upon the patient. This is a case of a 56-year-old woman who presented to our facility under critical conditions. She developed sepsis with acute respiratory failure, requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. Prior to her admission, her husband had been admitted at our facility's intensive care unit. On the same day when our patient was extubated, her husband had died. The palliative care team was consulted to assist with disclosing this information to the patient in light of her emotional fragility, her anxiety, and concerns for her ability to receive such news given her own active illnesses.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialAdvance directiveinformed consentmedical ethicspalliative caretherapeutic privilege

Identifiers

PMID35975340
PMCPMC9733515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.