Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35975063›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2022

Various defects in graphene: a review.

Mahesh Datt Bhatt, Heeju Kim, Gunn Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Resolving the Structural Duality of Graphene Grain Boundaries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Engineering two-dimensional electronic biosensors.Nature reviews electrical engineering · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hydrogen Bonding in Graphene.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Developments in Nanopatterning of Graphene; Toward Direct Writing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahesh Datt BhattHybrid Materials Center, Sejong University Seoul 05006 Korea gunnkim@sejong.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-9276
Heeju KimHybrid Materials Center, Sejong University Seoul 05006 Korea gunnkim@sejong.ac.kr.
Gunn KimHybrid Materials Center, Sejong University Seoul 05006 Korea gunnkim@sejong.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6016-1813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pristine graphene has been considered one of the most promising materials because of its excellent physical and chemical properties. However, various defects in graphene produced during synthesis or fabrication hinder its performance for applications such as electronic devices, transparent electrodes, and spintronic devices. Due to its intrinsic bandgap and nonmagnetic nature, it cannot be used in nanoelectronics or spintronics. Intrinsic and extrinsic defects are ultimately introduced to tailor electronic and magnetic properties and take advantage of their hidden potential. This article emphasizes the current advancement of intrinsic and extrinsic defects in graphene for potential applications. We also discuss the limitations and outlook for such defects in graphene.

Identifiers

PMID35975063
PMCPMC9347212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.