Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974972›Full record

ArticleNepal journal of epidemiology2022

Quarantine, physical distancing and social isolation measures in individuals potentially exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in community settings and health services: a scoping review.

Tereza Brenda Clementino de Freitas, Rafaella Cristina Tavares Belo, Sabrina Mércia Dos Santos Siebra, André de Macêdo Medeiros, Teresinha Silva de Brito, Sonia Elizabeth Lopez Carrillo, Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento, Sidnei Miyoshi Sakamoto, Maiara de Moraes

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nepal journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tereza Brenda Clementino de FreitasDepartment of Health Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences Center, Federal University of the Semi-Arid Region, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Rafaella Cristina Tavares BeloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Sabrina Mércia Dos Santos SiebraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
André de Macêdo MedeirosDepartment of Health Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences Center, Federal University of the Semi-Arid Region, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Teresinha Silva de BritoDepartment of Health Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences Center, Federal University of the Semi-Arid Region, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Sonia Elizabeth Lopez CarrilloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Israel Junior Borges do NascimentoDepartment of Health Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences Center, Federal University of the Semi-Arid Region, Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Sidnei Miyoshi SakamotoUniversity Hospital and School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maiara de MoraesDepartment of Pathology, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of the Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To provide a synthesis of diverse evidence on the impact of the non-therapeutic preventive measures, specifically quarantine, physical distancing and social isolation, on the control of COVID-19. A scoping review conducted in the PubMed, Embase, LILACS, CENTRAL and SCOPUS databases between 2019 and August 28th, 2020. The descriptors used were the following: "quarantine", "physical distancing", "social isolation", "COVID-19" and "SARS-Cov2". Studies that addressed the non-therapeutic preventive measures in people exposed to SARs-CoV-2 in community settings and health services were included. A total of 14,442 records identified through a database search were reduced to 346 studies and, after a standardized selection process, a total of 68 articles were selected for analysis. A total of 35 descriptive, cross-sectional or longitudinal observational studies were identified, as well as 3 reviews, in addition to 30 studies with mathematical modeling. The main intervention assessed was social distancing (56.6%), followed by lockdown (25.0%) and quarantine (18.4%). The main evidence analyzed points to the need for rapid responses to reduce the number of infections, deaths and hospital admissions, especially in intensive care unit beds.The current review revealed consistent reports that the quarantine, physical distancing and social isolation are effective strategies to contain spread of the new coronavirus.

Indexed as

ConfinementCoronavirusPhysical DistancingSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35974972
PMCPMC9374109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.