Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974719›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2022

Towards real-time analysis of liquid jet alignment in serial femtosecond crystallography.

Jaydeep Patel, Adam Round, Johan Bielecki, Katerina Doerner, Henry Kirkwood, Romain Letrun, Joachim Schulz, Marcin Sikorski, Mohammad Vakili, Raphael de Wijn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jaydeep PatelSchool of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Adam RoundEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0723-8228
Johan BieleckiEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3012-603X
Katerina DoernerEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.
Henry KirkwoodEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6792-3844
Romain LetrunEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0569-5193
Joachim SchulzEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9310-8832
Marcin SikorskiEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.
Mohammad VakiliEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9776-0177
Raphael de WijnEuropean XFEL, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-1008
Andrew PeeleAustralian Synchrotron, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Adrian P MancusoSchool of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-8969
Brian Ab BeySchool of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-0503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid sample delivery systems are used extensively for serial femtosecond crystallography at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs). However, misalignment of the liquid jet and the XFEL beam leads to the X-rays either partially or completely missing the sample, resulting in sample wastage and a loss of experiment time. Implemented here is an algorithm to analyse optical images using machine vision to determine whether there is overlap of the X-ray beam and liquid jet. The long-term goal is to use the output from this algorithm to implement an automated feedback mechanism to maintain constant alignment of the X-ray beam and liquid jet. The key elements of this jet alignment algorithm are discussed and its performance is characterized by comparing the results with a manual analysis of the optical image data. The success rate of the algorithm for correctly identifying hits is quantified via a similarity metric, the Dice coefficient. In total four different nozzle designs were used in this study, yielding an overall Dice coefficient of 0.98.

Indexed as

automationimage processingliquid jet alignmentmachine vision

Identifiers

PMID35974719
PMCPMC9348884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.