ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2022
Self-compassion and professional quality of life among midwives and nurse assistants: A cross-sectional study.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moral distress, moral residue, and associations with psychological distress: a cross-sectional study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- The efficacy of an inquiry-based stress reduction program on self-compassion and compassion for others in undergraduate nursing students.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Investigation of the relationship between self-compassion, interpersonal problem-solving skills, and authenticity level of midwifery students.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
- Virtual Reality Technology in Individual Self-Compassion Interventions: A Scoping Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Self-Compassion and Psychosocial Well-Being After Traumatic Births: Caring for the Midwife.Journal of midwifery & women's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelf-compassion and satisfaction derived from helping others is part of healthcare providers' professional quality of life. The aim of this study was to explore and psychometrically test two instruments measuring self-compassion and professional quality of life among midwives and nurse assistants.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study with midwives and nurse assistants working with intrapartum care at five different labor wards in Sweden. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) and the modified Professional Quality of Life Measurement (ProQOL) were validated and correlation analyses were calculated between the different subscales. Descriptive statistics, t-test, were calculated to analyze associations between the subscales of the SCS, the ProQOL and the background variables.
resultsMidwives were more self-critical than nurse assistants, and the midwives who were negative towards the new clinical practice scored higher for compassion fatigue. The principal component analysis showed a two-factor solution for both the SCS and the modified ProQOL. The two SCS subscales were named 'self-criticism' (α=0.85) and 'self-kindness' (α=0.87). The two ProQOL subscales were named 'compassion satisfaction' (α=0.83) and 'compassion fatigue' (α=0.78). A negative correlation was found between self-kindness and compassion fatigue subscales, between compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue, and between self-kindness and self-criticism.
conclusionsThe SCS and modified ProQOL are considered as valid questionnaires for use in a Swedish maternity setting and a correlation between the scales was found. Midwives are more self-critical than nurse assistants. Understanding and identifying compassion fatigue among midwives is important to managers responsible for quality improvement and practice changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.