Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974706›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2022

Exploring machine learning for audio-based respiratory condition screening: A concise review of databases, methods, and open issues.

Tong Xia, Jing Han, Cecilia Mascolo

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Audio-based digital biomarkers in diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tong XiaDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6994-6318
Jing HanDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-6849
Cecilia MascoloDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auscultation plays an important role in the clinic, and the research community has been exploring machine learning (ML) to enable remote and automatic auscultation for respiratory condition screening via sounds. To give the big picture of what is going on in this field, in this narrative review, we describe publicly available audio databases that can be used for experiments, illustrate the developed ML methods proposed to date, and flag some under-considered issues which still need attention. Compared to existing surveys on the topic, we cover the latest literature, especially those audio-based COVID-19 detection studies which have gained extensive attention in the last two years. This work can help to facilitate the application of artificial intelligence in the respiratory auscultation field.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19AuscultationHumansMachine LearningRespiratory Soundsartificial intelligenceauscultationautomatic disease diagnosismachine learningRespiratory abnormityrespiratory sound

Identifiers

PMID35974706
PMCPMC9791302
OpenAlexW4292298985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.