Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974556›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2022

Resolution exchange with tunneling for enhanced sampling of protein landscapes.

Fatih Yasar, Alan J Ray, Ulrich H E Hansmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modulation of AβJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Early Stages of RNA-Mediated Conversion of Human Prions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatih YasarDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA.
Alan J RayDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA.
Ulrich H E HansmannDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA.
University of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Efficient and Accurate Force Fields for Computer-Aided Drug DesignR01GM120578 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI Feng Wang · 2017 to 2026
$1.9M
Structural Transitions in Proteins and Protein AssembliesR01GM120634 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI HANSMANN, ULRICH H.E. · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120578NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulations of protein folding and protein association happen on timescales that are orders of magnitude larger than what can typically be covered in all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Use of low-resolution models alleviates this problem but may reduce the accuracy of the simulations. We introduce a replica-exchange-based multiscale sampling technique that combines the faster sampling in coarse-grained simulations with the potentially higher accuracy of all-atom simulations. After testing the efficiency of our Resolution Exchange with Tunneling (ResET) in simulations of the Trp-cage protein, an often used model to evaluate sampling techniques in protein simulations, we use our approach to compare the landscape of wild-type and A2T mutant Aβ_{1-42} peptides. Our results suggest a mechanism by that the mutation of a small hydrophobic alanine (A) into a bulky polar threonine (T) may interfere with the self-assembly of Aβ fibrils.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsPeptidesProtein FoldingPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID35974556
PMCPMC9389597
OpenAlexW3209054028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.