Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974469›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2022

Assessing the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool in the detection of human DNA in water.

Marie Antony Dass, Craig D H Sherman, Yi Heng Nai, Morgan R Ellis, Roland A H van Oorschot, Annalisa Durdle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie Antony DassSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6596-4159
Craig D H ShermanSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia.
Yi Heng NaiCentre for Regional and Rural Futures (CeRRF), Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia.
Morgan R EllisSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia.
Roland A H van OorschotOffice of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, Mcleod, Vic, Australia.
Annalisa DurdleSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5986-5792
Deakin University · AUVictoria Police · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is a highly sensitive and cost-effective tool that is increasingly being applied to studies of biodiversity and species detection. This non-invasive method relies on the collection of environmental samples that contain genetic material being shed into surrounding environment by the target organism/s. While forensic science has a long history of using molecular tools for collecting DNA from the environment, the detection of human DNA from environmental water samples has been limited. This study investigated the detection and degradation rates of human eDNA in water samples under controlled laboratory conditions. Using a human-specific qPCR assay targeting the ND1 region of human mitochondrial DNA, eDNA degradation over time in water spiked with human blood was assessed. Recovery of nuclear DNA was investigated by determining if routine DNA short tandem repeat (STR) profiles of the blood source could be generated. Results demonstrated that human eDNA remains detectable for up to 11 days under laboratory conditions in environmental water and up to 35 days in distilled water. Partial STR profiles could be recovered from environmental water only up to 24 h, while, in distilled water, partial profiles continued to be recovered up to 840 h. These findings demonstrate that sampling human eDNA from aquatic samples can provide reliable human DNA detection within relatively short time windows, assisting law enforcement agencies by providing information about the potential time an individual may have been present in an area or assisting in the detection and location of a body or remains in aquatic environments.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalBiodiversityDNA, MitochondrialHumansWaterDNA, EnvironmentalDNA, MitochondrialWaterbloodDNA degradationenvironmental DNA (eDNA)environmental waterhuman DNAmitochondrial DNAnuclear DNAshort tandem repeat

Identifiers

PMID35974469
PMCPMC9804157
OpenAlexW4292295125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.