Trial reportSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2022
Efficacy of a novel microneedle patch for rejuvenation of the nasolabial fold.
Trial report in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of a novel microneedle patch for rejuvenation of the nasolabial fold.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022Trial
- Clinical effect of botulinum toxin type A combined with autologous fat grafting in patients with nasolabial fold depression.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Advances in the Application of Black Phosphorus-Based Composite Biomedical Materials in the Field of Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkin rejuvenation plays a significant role in the esthetic medicine market. Microneedle patches have been developed for a wide range of applications based on the principles of transdermal drug delivery; however, clinical trials of microneedle patches for skin rejuvenation remain limited.
aimsThis study was conducted to examine the efficacy of microneedle patches for improving nasolabial folds.
methodsA total of 23 Thai women completed this prospective clinical trial. The participants were treated according to a split-face design, with application of microneedle patch plus 1.8% hyaluronic acid solution to the right nasolabial fold and microneedle patch alone to the left nasolabial fold. The treatments were applied to the nasolabial fold for 8 weeks. The test areas were measured before treatment and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after the use of the test product.
resultsCombination treatment using the microneedle patch plus hyaluronic acid solution and use of the microneedle patch alone both significantly improved the Merz esthetic scales for nasolabial folds. Measurement of the nasolabial fold showed an improvement in the two groups, with no significant differences between the groups. No adverse effects were reported during the study period.
conclusionsApplication of a microneedle patch with 1.8% hyaluronic acid solution or a microneedle patch alone were both effective treatments for improving facial wrinkles in the nasolabial folds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.