Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974460›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Giving up on the objective of providing goal-concordant care: Advance care planning for improving caregiver outcomes.

Terri R Fried

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04922320 (Effect of Patient Priorities Care Implementation in Older Veterans With Multiple Chronic Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04922320 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Patient Priorities Care Implementation in Older Veterans With Multiple Chronic Conditions

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2022 to 2025Enrolled420ConditionsMultiple Chronic Conditions, Decision Making, SharedArmsPatient Priorities Care, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advance care planning in patients with respiratory failure.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Terri R FriedDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8083-8265
VA Connecticut Healthcare System · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Ferrante · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The merits and effectiveness of advance care planning (ACP) continue to be debated a full 30 years after the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act. This act gave patients the right to create advance directives, with the objective of ensuring that the care they received at the end of life was consistent with their preferences and goals. ACP has definitively moved beyond the completion of advance directives to encompass the identification of a healthcare agent and the facilitation of communication among patients, surrogates, and clinicians. Nonetheless, the provision of goal-concordant care remains a primary objective for ACP. This article argues that this cannot and should not be the objective for ACP. Patients' goals change, and the provision of goal-concordant care is sometimes incompatible with other critical determinants of appropriate care. Instead, ACP should focus on the objective of improving caregiver outcomes. Surrogate decision-making by caregivers is associated with an elevated risk of post-traumatic stress disorder and other adverse outcomes, and these outcomes can be improved with ACP. ACP focused on caregivers involves helping caregivers to understand how they can help to shape the final chapter in a patient's life story, preventing caregivers from making promises they cannot keep, and preparing them to use all relevant information at the time decisions need to be made.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCaregiversAdvance DirectivesCommunicationDecision MakingGoalsHumansadvance care planningcaregiverssurrogate decision-making

Identifiers

PMID35974460
PMCPMC9588724
OpenAlexW4292295220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.