ArticleClinical epigenetics2022
Discovery and validation of tissue-specific DNA methylation as noninvasive diagnostic markers for colorectal cancer.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Utility of Cytological Methylation Assay in Cervical Cancer Screening Across Various Cervical Transformation Zones.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- TiSMeD: A tissue-specific methylation and expression database for biomarker and translational applications.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Blood-Based cfDNA/ctDNA Tests for Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- A scoping review of DNA methylation biomarkers for non-invasive detection of colorectal cancer at the CpG site level.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Dynamic DNA methylation changes during colorectal oncogenesis with insights from adenoma stages.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Triage performance of DNA methylation for women with high-risk human papillomavirus infection.The oncologist · 2025Article
- COL25A1 and METAP1D DNA methylation are promising liquid biopsy epigenetic biomarkers of colorectal cancer using digital PCR.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Discovery and validation of colorectal cancer tissue-specific methylation markers: a dual-center retrospective cohort study.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- SNORA28 Promotes Proliferation and Radioresistance in Colorectal Cancer Cells through the STAT3 Pathway by Increasing H3K9 Acetylation in the LIFR Promoter.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Quantification method of ctDNA using cell-free DNA methylation profile for noninvasive screening and monitoring of colon cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- A multi-omics analysis-based model to predict the prognosis of low-grade gliomas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tissue of origin prediction for cancer of unknown primary using a targeted methylation sequencing panel.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Propensity score matching as an effective strategy for biomarker cohort design and omics data analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- DNA methylation modulates epigenetic regulation in colorectal cancer diagnosis, prognosis and precision medicine.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024Review
- Validation of hypermethylated DNA regions found in colorectal cancers as potential aging-independent biomarkers of precancerous colorectal lesions.BMC cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNoninvasive diagnostic markers that are capable of distinguishing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from healthy individuals or patients with other cancer types are lacking. We report the discovery and validation of a panel of methylation-based markers that specifically detect CRC.
methodsThis was a large-scale discovery study based on publicly available datasets coupled with a validation study where multiple types of specimens from six cohorts with CRC, other cancer types, and healthy individuals were used to identify and validate the tissue-specific methylation patterns of CRC and assess their diagnostic performance.
resultsIn the discovery and validation cohort (N = 9307), ten hypermethylated CpG sites located in three genes, C20orf194, LIFR, and ZNF304, were identified as CRC-specific markers. Different analyses have suggested that these CpG sites are CRC-specific hypermethylated and play a role in transcriptional silencing of corresponding genes. A random forest model based on ten markers achieved high accuracy rates between 85.7 and 94.3% and AUCs between 0.941 and 0.970 in predicting CRC in three independent datasets and a low misclassification rate in ten other cancer types. In the in-house validation cohort (N = 354), these markers achieved consistent discriminative capabilities. In the cfDNA pilot cohort (N = 14), hypermethylation of these markers was observed in cfDNA samples from CRC patients. In the cfDNA validation cohort (N = 155), the two-gene panel yielded a sensitivity of 69.5%, specificity of 91.7%, and AUC of 0.806.
conclusionsHypermethylation of the ten CpG sites is a CRC-specific alteration in tissue and has the potential use as a noninvasive cfDNA marker to diagnose CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.