Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974253›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Implementation of entrustable professional activities into fellowship council accredited programs: a pilot project.

Melissa N Hanson, Aurora D Pryor, D Rohan Jeyarajah, Rebecca M Minter, Samer G Mattar, Daniel J Scott, L Michael Brunt, Maria Cummings, Melina Vassiliou, Liane S Feldman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melissa N HansonDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
Aurora D PryorDepartment of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
D Rohan JeyarajahDepartment of Surgery, TCU School of Medicine and Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Richardson, TX, 75082, USA.
Rebecca M MinterDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Samer G MattarMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Daniel J ScottDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
L Michael BruntDepartment of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Maria CummingsThe Fellowship Council, Los Angeles, CA, 90064, USA.
Melina VassiliouDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
Liane S FeldmanDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. liane.feldman@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0445-7767
FC EPA Pilot Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Fellowship Council (FC) is transitioning to a competency-based medical education (CBME) model, including the introduction of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for training and assessment of Fellows. This study describes the implementation process employed by the FC during a ten-month pilot project and presents data regarding feasibility and perceived value.

methodsThe FC coordinated the development of EPAs in collaboration with the sponsoring societies for Advanced GI/MIS, Bariatrics, Foregut, Endoscopy and Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) fellowships encompassing the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care for key competencies. Fifteen accredited fellowship programs participated in this project. The assessments were collected through a unique platform on the FC website. Programs were asked to convene a Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) on a quarterly basis. The pilot group met monthly to support and improve the process. An exit survey evaluated the perceived value of EPAs.

resultsThe 15 participating programs included 18 fellows and 106 faculty. A total of 655 assessments were initiated with 429 (65%) completed. The average (SD) number of EPAs completed for each fellow was 24(18); range 0-72. Intraoperative EPAs were preferentially completed (71%). The average(SD) time for both the fellow and faculty to complete an EPA was 27(78) hours. Engagement increased from 39% of fellows completing at least one EPA in September to 72% in December and declining to 50% in May. Entrustment level increased from 6% of EPAs evaluated as "Practice Ready" in September to 75% in June. The exit survey was returned by 63% of faculty and 72% of fellows. Overall, 46% of fellows and 74% of program directors recommended full-scale implementation of the EPA framework.

conclusionA competency-based assessment framework was developed by the FC and piloted in several programs. Participation was variable and required ongoing strategies to address barriers. The pilot project has prepared the FC to introduce CBME across all FC training programs.

Indexed as

BariatricsFellowships and ScholarshipsClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationHumansPilot ProjectsAssessmentCompetency-based medical educationEntrustable professional activitiesEntrustmentEvaluationFellowship council

Identifiers

PMID35974253
PMCPMC9381155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.