Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Healthy worker survival effect at a high-altitude mine: prospective cohort observation.

Denis Vinnikov, Viktor Krasotski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Denis Vinnikoval-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi avenue, Almaty, 050040, Kazakhstan. denisvinnikov23@gmail.com.
Viktor KrasotskiKumtor Gold Company, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Very little is known about the factors of healthy worker survival effect at high-altitude mines. We conducted this cohort observation of the new hires for a high-altitude gold mine in Kyrgyzstan with the aim to ascertain predictors of survival at work. All new hires in 2009 through 2012 for a high-altitude gold mine (3600-4500 m above sea level) were followed up to January 2022. We tested the association of demographic, physiological predictors and diagnoses at the pre-employment screening with non-survival at work in Cox proportional hazards yielding hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The cumulative observation time was 5190 person-years. Blood pressure at pre-employment, lung function, the diagnoses of essential hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or any other analyzed physiological variables were not associated with non-survival at work. However, smoking (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.10; 2.17) increased the likelihood of non-survival at work, independent of any diagnosis or lowland residence (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.31; 2.90). Adjusted for covariates and all diagnoses, having chronic rheumatic fever (HR 10.95; 95% CI 2.92; 33.92), hemorrhoids (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.01; 3.75), adhesive otitis (HR 1.74; 95% CI 1.05; 2.89) or obesity (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.01; 2.88) were associated with non-survival at work with time. This prospective observation of new hires for a high-altitude mining operation demonstrated that selected diagnoses, smoking and lowland residence elevated the risk of early exit in prospective workers.

Indexed as

AltitudeMiningCohort StudiesGoldHumansProspective StudiesRisk FactorsGold

Identifiers

PMID35974144
PMCPMC9381584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.