Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974140›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2022

Independent replication of advanced brain age in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: detection of future cognitive dysfunction.

Helmet T Karim, Howard J Aizenstein, Akiko Mizuno, Maria Ly, Carmen Andreescu, Minjie Wu, Chang Hyung Hong, Hyun Woong Roh, Bumhee Park, Heirim Lee and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. BrainAGE, brain health, and mental disorders: A systematic review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Brain Age Is Not a Significant Predictor of Relapse Risk in Late-Life Depression.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Helmet T KarimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Howard J AizensteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Akiko MizunoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Maria LyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Carmen AndreescuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3767-5127
Minjie WuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chang Hyung HongDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Woong RohDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Bumhee ParkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Heirim LeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Na-Rae KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jin Wook ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sang Won SeoDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong Hye ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Joo KimDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical research institute, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Byeong C KimDepartment of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Jae Youn CheongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Eunyoung LeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Gi LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7885-7894
Yong Hyuk ChoDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
So Young MoonDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sang Joon SonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. sjsonpsy@ajou.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-7996
Ajou University · KRUniversity of Pittsburgh · USChonnam National University Hospital · KRInha University · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously developed a novel machine-learning-based brain age model that was sensitive to amyloid. We aimed to independently validate it and to demonstrate its utility using independent clinical data. We recruited 650 participants from South Korean memory clinics to undergo magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessments. We employed a pretrained brain age model that used data from an independent set of largely Caucasian individuals (n = 757) who had no or relatively low levels of amyloid as confirmed by positron emission tomography (PET). We investigated the association between brain age residual and cognitive decline. We found that our pretrained brain age model was able to reliably estimate brain age (mean absolute error = 5.68 years, r(650) = 0.47, age range = 49-89 year) in the sample with 71 participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), 375 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 204 with dementia. Greater brain age was associated with greater amyloid and worse cognitive function [Odds Ratio, (95% Confidence Interval {CI}): 1.28 (1.06-1.55), p = 0.030 for amyloid PET positivity; 2.52 (1.76-3.61), p < 0.001 for dementia]. Baseline brain age residual was predictive of future cognitive worsening even after adjusting for apolipoprotein E e4 and amyloid status [Hazard Ratio, (95% CI): 1.94 (1.33-2.81), p = 0.001 for total 336 follow-up sample; 2.31 (1.44-3.71), p = 0.001 for 284 subsample with baseline Clinical Dementia Rating ≤ 0.5; 2.40 (1.43-4.03), p = 0.001 for 240 subsample with baseline SCD or MCI]. In independent data set, these results replicate our previous findings using this model, which was able to delineate significant differences in brain age according to the diagnostic stages of dementia as well as amyloid deposition status. Brain age models may offer benefits in discriminating and tracking cognitive impairment in older adults.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesApolipoprotein E4BrainChild, PreschoolCognitionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyAmyloid beta-PeptidesApolipoprotein E4

Identifiers

PMID35974140
PMCPMC9763106
OpenAlexW4292061492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.