Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974096›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2022

Macrophages as tools and targets in cancer therapy.

Alberto Mantovani, Paola Allavena, Federica Marchesi, Cecilia Garlanda

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,093 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,093citing papers in PubMed
133.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,093 citing papers in PubMed, 1,634 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A FABulous approach to image human macrophages.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Understanding and targeting the tumour matrisome.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  13. From signals to phenotype: multifactorial drivers of tumor-associated macrophage polarization in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Macrophages are what they eat.Nature chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,033 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto MantovaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. alberto.mantovani@humanitasresearch.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5578-236X
Paola AllavenaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Federica MarchesiIRCCS- Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7212-5721
Cecilia GarlandaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-7703
Humanitas University · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour-associated macrophages are an essential component of the tumour microenvironment and have a role in the orchestration of angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodelling, cancer cell proliferation, metastasis and immunosuppression, as well as in resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Conversely, when appropriately activated, macrophages can mediate phagocytosis of cancer cells and cytotoxic tumour killing, and engage in effective bidirectional interactions with components of the innate and adaptive immune system. Therefore, they have emerged as therapeutic targets in cancer therapy. Macrophage-targeting strategies include inhibitors of cytokines and chemokines involved in the recruitment and polarization of tumour-promoting myeloid cells as well as activators of their antitumorigenic and immunostimulating functions. Early clinical trials suggest that targeting negative regulators (checkpoints) of myeloid cell function indeed has antitumor potential. Finally, given the continuous recruitment of myelomonocytic cells into tumour tissues, macrophages are candidates for cell therapy with the development of chimeric antigen receptor effector cells. Macrophage-centred therapeutic strategies have the potential to complement, and synergize with, currently available tools in the oncology armamentarium.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyMacrophagesTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID35974096
PMCPMC9380983
OpenAlexW4291993576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.