ArticleScientific reports2022
Sex differences in machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes of deferred revascularisation following negative fractional flow reserve in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Pooled it
- Sex differences in MASLD-related atherosclerosis: plaque phenotype, vascular dysfunction, and cardiovascular outcomes.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women's Cardiovascular Disease Care.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Sex Differences in Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Among Patients With Intermediate Coronary Lesions.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Gender Medicine in Clinical Radiology Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) derived machine learning fractional flow reserve (ML-FFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.