Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974037›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Predictors of weaning failure in case of VA ECMO implantation.

Axelle Cusanno, Nadia Aissaoui, Vincent Minville, Jean Porterie, Caroline Biendel, Kim Volle, Laure Crognier, Jean-Marie Conil, Clément Delmas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Importance of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in congenital heart diseases: a systematic review.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Axelle CusannoDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Care Medicine, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Nadia AissaouiMedical Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Vincent MinvilleDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Care Medicine, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Jean PorterieDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Caroline BiendelIntensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Kim VolleDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Care Medicine, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Laure CrognierDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Care Medicine, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Marie ConilDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Care Medicine, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Clément DelmasIntensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, 1, avenue Jean Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France. delmas.clement@chu-toulouse.fr.
Hôpital Rangueil · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock has increased significantly. Nevertheless, early weaning may be advisable to reduce the potential for severe complications. Only a few studies focusing on ECMO weaning predictors are currently available. Our objective was to evaluate factors that may help predict failure during VA ECMO weaning. We included 57 patients on VA ECMO support previously considered suitable for weaning based on specific criteria. Clinical, haemato-chemical and echocardiographic assessment was considered before and after a "weaning test" (ECMO flow < 2 L/min for at least 60 min). ECMO removal was left to the discretion of the medical team blinded to the results. Weaning failure was defined as a patient who died or required a new VA ECMO, heart transplant or LVAD 30 days after ECMO removal. Thirty-six patients (63.2%) were successfully weaned off VA ECMO, of whom 31 (54.4%) after the first weaning test. In case of first test failure, 3 out of 7 patients could be weaned after a 2nd test and 3 out of 4 patients after a 3rd test. Pre-existing ischemic heart disease (OR 9.6 [1.1-83]), pre-test left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 25% and/or post-test LVEF ≤ 40% (OR 11 [0.98-115]), post-test systolic blood pressure ≤ 120 mmHg (OR 33 [3-385]), or length of ECMO support > 7 days (OR 24 [2-269]) were predictors of weaning failure. The VA ECMO weaning test failed in less than 40% of patients considered suitable for weaning. Clinical and echocardiographic criteria, which are easily accessible by a non-expert intensivist, may help increase the probability of successful weaning.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart TransplantationHumansRetrospective StudiesShock, CardiogenicStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID35974037
PMCPMC9381562
OpenAlexW4292182663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.