Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35973959›Full record

ReviewInternal medicine journal2022

Approved gene therapies in Australia: coming to a store near you.

Shreyashee Mallik, Charles G Bailey, John E J Rasko

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internal medicine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A quest for stakeholder synchronization in the CAR T-cell therapy supply chain.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shreyashee MallikGene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-3146
Charles G BaileyGene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-7829
John E J RaskoGene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2975-807X
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Cancer Council NSW 18-03Cure the Future FoundationNational Health and Medical Research Council 1177305Tour de Cure RSP-278-18/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy has been promising paradigm-shifting advances in medical science for over two decades. Broadly, it is defined as a human therapy in which an existing defective gene function is added to, replaced, edited or disrupted to achieve a clinical benefit, up to and including a potential lifelong cure. Although originally set out to treat monogenic disorders, gene therapy has since been utilised to treat neoplasia, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as infections. The realisation of this therapy has been dependent on the achievement of fundamental milestones in medicine, from determining the human genome sequence to identifying effective vehicles for the gene of interest, ultimately facilitating gene delivery in humans. In this review, six approved gene and cell therapies available in Australia are described. Their efficacy, adverse effects, limitations and eligibility are discussed, as well as an overview of cost and future directions.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeurodegenerative DiseasesAustraliaGenetic TherapyHumansadeno-associated viruscell therapychimeric antigen receptor T cellsgene therapy

Identifiers

PMID35973959
PMCPMC9545855
OpenAlexW4292169461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.