ArticleRespiratory care2023
Positive Airway Pressure Device Care and Cleaning Practices in the Pediatric Home.
Article in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- An Overview of Survey Research.Respiratory care · 2023Article
- Formulating the Research Question and Framing the Hypothesis.Respiratory care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegular care and cleaning of positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are important for maintaining equipment in the home. Illness and hospitalization have occurred from inadequate cleaning and use of tap water in the humidifier. In recent years, ozone and ultraviolent-light disinfection devices have been advertised for cleaning home PAP equipment. Our clinic provides instructions; however, cleaning practices performed in the home are unknown.
methodsA survey of home cleaning practices for PAP equipment was conducted in a pediatric sleep clinic during 2019-2020. Survey domains were method, cleaning and replacement frequency for each component, type of water used, instruction preferences, and demographics. The primary aim was to identify home PAP cleaning practices and compare with provided instructions. The secondary aim was to determine if respiratory-related symptoms (eg, congestion, runny nose, sneezing, coughing) occurred or increased with PAP use or inadequate cleaning.
resultsThe survey was completed by 96 respondents. Most reported weekly cleaning of mask (36, 38%), tubing (41, 43%), and humidifier (31, 33%) with soap and water as the primary method for each. The majority used distilled water in the humidifier (74, 77%) and reported respiratory symptoms did not occur with PAP use (64, 67%). Very few indicated a device was used to clean equipment. No associations were found between length of time for PAP use and cleaning practices. There was a moderately low correlation between age and cleaning. Increased age was associated with decreased cleaning frequency (r = 0.20,
conclusionsCare and cleaning practices of home PAP equipment varied from instructions provided in clinic. Most reported at least weekly cleaning of items for which daily cleaning is recommended. Few reported using a device for cleaning or having respiratory symptoms from PAP treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.