Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35973468›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2022

Evaluation of the impact of pre-analytical conditions on sample stability for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Lucy Mosscrop, Patricia Watber, Paul Elliot, Graham Cooke, Wendy Barclay, Paul S Freemont, Carolina Rosadas, Graham P Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. RT-qPCR Testing and Performance Metrics in the COVID-19 Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy MosscropDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Patricia WatberDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul ElliotSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Graham CookeDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wendy BarclayDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul S FreemontDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carolina RosadasDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Graham P TaylorDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: g.p.taylor@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demand for accurate SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics is high. Most samples in the UK are collected in the community and rely on the postal service for delivery to the laboratories. The current recommendation remains that swabs should be collected in Viral Transport Media (VTM) and transported with a cold chain to the laboratory for RNA extraction and RT-qPCR. This is not always possible. We aimed to test the stability of SARS-CoV-2 RNA subjected to different pre-analytical conditions. Swabs were dipped into PBS containing cultured SARS-CoV-2 and placed in either a dry tube or a tube containing either normal saline or VTM. The tubes were then stored at different temperatures (20-50 °C) for variable periods (8 h to 5 days). Samples were tested by RT-qPCR targeting SARS-CoV-2 E gene. VTM outperformed swabs in saline and dry swabs in all conditions. Samples in VTM were stable, independent of a cold chain, for 5 days, with a maximum increase in cycle threshold (Ct) of 1.34 when held at 40 °C. Using normal saline as the transport media resulted in a loss of sensitivity (increased Ct) over time and with increasing temperature (up to 7.8 cycles compared to VTM). SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in 3/9 samples in normal saline when tested after 120 h incubation. Transportation of samples in VTM provides a high level of confidence in the results despite the potential for considerable, uncontrolled variation in temperature and longer transportation periods. False negative results may be seen after 96 h in saline and viral loads will appear lower.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Clinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 TestingHumansRNA, ViralSaline SolutionSpecimen HandlingRNA, ViralSaline SolutionDiagnosisRNART-qPCRSample stabilitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35973468
PMCPMC9374597
OpenAlexW4291115682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.