Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972927›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Evaluating the efficacy of Mazao Tickoff (Metarhizium anisopliae ICIPE 7) in controlling natural tick infestations on cattle in coastal Kenya: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Joseph Wang'ang'a Oundo, Daniel Masiga, Michael Nyang'anga Okal, Gebbiena M Bron, Komivi S Akutse, Sevgan Subramanian, Quirine Ten Bosch, Constantianus J M Koenraadt, Shewit Kalayou

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph Wang'ang'a OundoInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6435-3428
Daniel MasigaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-7513-0887
Michael Nyang'anga OkalInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya.
Gebbiena M BronQuantitative Veterinary Epidemiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4431-2482
Komivi S AkutseInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya.
Sevgan SubramanianInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya.
Quirine Ten BoschQuantitative Veterinary Epidemiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Constantianus J M KoenraadtLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Shewit KalayouInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks and tick-borne diseases cause substantial economic losses to the livestock industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Mazao Tickoff is a novel bioacaricide developed for tick control and is based on the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae sensu lato (s.l.) isolate ICIPE 7. To date, no randomized controlled study has been undertaken to demonstrate the efficacy of this bioacaricide in reducing natural tick infestation on cattle. To this end, this field trial is designed to evaluate the anti-tick efficacy of Mazao Tickoff on cattle in coastal Kenya compared to a standard chemical tick control protocol. In this prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial, eligible herds will be randomized by the herd size to the intervention arm in a 1:1:1 ratio to either Triatix® (active ingredient: amitraz); Mazao Tickoff (active ingredient: M. anisopliae ICIPE 7); or placebo (excipients of the Mazao Tickoff), with a total enrollment target of 1,077 cattle. Treatments will be dispensed on Day 0 (defined individually as the day each animal receives the first treatment) and thereafter every two weeks until Day 182. Ticks will be counted on every animal in each herd (herds to be included have at least one animal bearing at least one tick on Day 0), and thereafter on bi-weekly intervals until Day 182. The primary efficacy assessments of Mazao Tickoff will be based on the mean percentage reduction in tick counts at each post-treatment follow-up visit compared to the placebo group and the Triatix® arm. Further, the effect of Mazao Tickoff on the prevalence of common cattle pathogens, Anaplasma marginale and Theileria parva, will be determined by assessing incidence and seroprevalence at four different time points. This protocol describes the first rigorous evaluation of the efficacy of Mazao Tickoff and its potential as a viable alternative non-chemical acaricide tool for tick control in Kenya and elsewhere.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMetarhiziumTick InfestationsTicksAnimalsCattleClinical Trials, Veterinary as TopicKenyaMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesSeroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID35972927
PMCPMC9380929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.