Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972848›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2022

Disruption in accessing sexual and reproductive health services among border populations during COVID-19 lockdown in Uganda.

Paul Bukuluki, Peter Kisaakye, Francis Mulekya, John Mushomi, Chrispus Mayora, George Palattiyil, Dina Sidhva, Harish Nair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changes in reproductive, maternal, and child health in Haiti during the pre- and peri-COVID-19 pandemic.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul Bukuluki *Department of Social Work and Social Administration, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter Kisaakye *Department of Population Studies, School of Statistics and Planning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Francis Mulekya *Department of Social Work and Social Administration, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
John Mushomi *Department of Population Studies, School of Statistics and Planning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Chrispus Mayora *Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
George PalattiyilDepartment of Social Work, School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Dina SidhvaDepartment of Social Work, School of Education and Social Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK.
Harish NairCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Makerere University · UGUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of the West of Scotland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The spread of COVID-19 exposed the inadequacies inherent in the health care systems of many countries. COVID-19 and the attendant demands for emergency treatment and management put a significant strain on countries' health care systems, including hitherto strong health systems. In Uganda, as the government strived to contain COVID-19, other essential health care services were either disrupted or completely crowded out. Balancing the provision of COVID-19 treatment and management services and at the same time offering sexual and reproductive health and rights services (SRHR) proved to be a considerable challenge in these circumstances. COVID-19 prevention-related travel restrictions and border closures had far-reaching negative consequences on the mobility of individuals to access essential health services in Uganda. The situation may have been worse for cross-border communities that sometimes access services across the borders. Methods: Using quantitative data from 1521 respondents and qualitative data (20 key informant interviews and 12 focus group discussions), we investigate the disruption in accessing SRHR services for border communities in Uganda during COVID-19. Results: Results indicate that females (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.3; 95% confidence interval CI = 1.08-1.79), those with primary education (aOR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.61-2.57), currently employed (aOR = 2.03; 95% CI = 1.61-2.57) and those with the intention to leave current residence (aOR = 2.09; 95% CI = 1.23-3.55) were more likely to have experienced a disruption in accessing SRHR services. However, respondents aged 35 years, or more were less likely to have experienced a disruption compared to their younger counterparts. Conclusions: Results shed light on the disruption of access toSRHR services during pandemics such as COVID-19 among a highly mobile population. There is a need to invest in building strong and resilient health care systems that can guarantee continuous access to essential health services including SRHR provisions among mobile populations during pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentReproductive Health ServicesCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansUganda

Identifiers

PMID35972848
PMCPMC9380899
OpenAlexW4291997328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.