Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972832›Full record

Trial reportJournal of global health2022

Effectiveness of a complex, pre-conception intervention to reduce the risk of diabetes by reducing adiposity in young adults in Malaysia: The Jom Mama project - A randomised controlled trial.

Ainul Nm Hanafiah, Jens Aagaard-Hansen, Julius Ch Cheah, Shane A Norris, Zulkarnain Ba Karim, Jutta Kh Skau, Zainudin M Ali, Regien Biesma, Priya Matzen, Lokman H Sulaiman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Diabetes and women's health.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Exploring the effects ofBMJ open · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Ainul Nm HanafiahInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jens Aagaard-HansenHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Julius Ch CheahSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Shane A NorrisSA MRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Zulkarnain Ba KarimInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jutta Kh SkauSA MRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Zainudin M AliNegeri Sembilan State Health Department, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Regien BiesmaGlobal Health Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Priya MatzenHuman Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Lokman H SulaimanOffice of the Deputy Director General of Health (Public Health), Ministry of Health, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Mark HansonInstitute of Developmental Sciences, British Heart Foundation Professor of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ministry of Health · MYSouth African Medical Research Council · ZABritish Heart Foundation · GBMalaysia Theological Seminary · MYMonash University Malaysia · MYSteno Diabetes Center · DKUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pre-conception interventions have the potential to lower non-communicable disease risk in prospective parents and reduce transmission of risk factors such as obesity to the next generation. The Jom Mama project in Malaysia investigated the effectiveness of a combined behaviour change communication and e-health intervention in young married couples prior to first pregnancy. This paper reports the evaluation of the effectiveness of this trial. Methods: Jom Mama was a non-blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in Seremban, Malaysia, over a period of 33 weeks, covering six contact points between trained community health workers and newly married couples before the conception of a first child. Out of 2075 eligible nulliparous women, 549 participated and 305 completed the intervention, with 145 women in the intervention and 160 in the control group. The intervention group received a complex behavioural change intervention, combining behaviour change communication provided by community health promoters and access to a habit formation mobile application, while the control group received the standard care provided by public health clinics in Malaysia. The primary outcome was a change in the woman's waist circumference. Secondary outcomes were anthropometric and metabolic measures, dietary intake (Food Frequency Questionnaire, FFQ), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire, IPAQ) and mental health (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, DASS 21). An extensive process evaluation was conducted alongside the trial in order to aid the interpretation of the main findings. Results: There were no significant differences of change in the woman's waist circumference between intervention and control groups at the start and end of the intervention. While the weight, waist circumference and Body Mass Index (BMI) of women in both groups increased, there was a significantly lower increase in the intervention vs the control group over the period of the trial among women who are obese (0.1 kg vs 1.7 kg; P = 0.023, in the intervention and control group respectively). In terms of BMI, the obese intervention subgroup showed a slight reduction (0.01) compared to the obese control subgroup whose BMI increased by 0.7 (P = 0.015). There were no changes in the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions: The Jom Mama pre-conception intervention did not lead to a reduction in waist circumference or significant changes in other secondary outcomes over the eight months prior to conception. However, there was a significantly smaller weight gain in the intervention vs the control group, predominantly in women with pre-existing obesity.

Indexed as

AdiposityDiabetes MellitusBody Mass IndexChildFemaleHumansMalaysiaObesityPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35972832
PMCPMC9380849
OpenAlexW4292175892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.