ArticleJournal of applied genetics2022
Virulence genes, phylogenetic analysis, and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients and outpatients.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut Bacteria: A Beneficial Symbiosis or a Hidden Threat? Investigating the Dual Role of Bacteria in Gastrointestinal Diseases.Current microbiology · 2026Review
- A comparative analysis of CRISPR systems, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance genes in carbapenem-sensitive and carbapenem-resistantIranian journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- A Critical Review on the Potential of Inactivated Bacteria in Counteracting Human Pathogens.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Correlation between antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence determinants in uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Egyptian hospital.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains are the most common cause of urinary tract infection (UTI) in hospitalized and community patients. The aim was to compare the genetic characteristics of E. coli isolated from inpatients (IPs) and outpatients (OPs) with UTI regarding their phylogenies, virulence traits, and resistance trends. In this cross-sectional study, 130 epidemiologically unrelated E. coli isolates were collected from patients with UTI. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production was detected by the combination disk method. UPEC and intestinal pathogenic E. coli (IPEC) virulence genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction. The isolates were analyzed for phylogenetic grouping. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Of the 130 isolates, 62.3% were from OPs and 37.7% from IPs. About 35.8% of the OPs and 49% of the IPs were ESBL positive. Moreover, 56.8% of the OPs and 59.2% of the IPs were positive for UPEC virulence genes. Notably, 50% of the isolates from each group exhibited IPEC virulence properties. The predominant phylogroup was B2 (43.2% in the OPs and 40.8% in the IPs). No significant difference was found between the IP and OP isolates (P > 0.05). Our results may indicate that consideration should also be given to hygienic standards in the community. The marked genetic plasticity of E. coli has allowed the emergence of strains showing arrays of genes from different pathotypes. Characterization of E. coli isolates in different areas may guide the selection of effective infection control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.